Re: [dhcwg] RE: draft-ietf-dhc-3315id-for-v4-01.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 29 January 2004 21:56 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA21872 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:56:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AmK8T-0003fY-3c for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:55:41 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0TLtfGJ014103 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:55:41 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AmK8S-0003fO-SG for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:55:40 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA21849 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:55:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AmK8Q-0001RV-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:55:38 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AmK7X-0001KN-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:54:43 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AmK6r-0001Dg-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:54:01 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AmK6r-0003US-A5; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:54:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AmK6a-0003T0-K4 for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:53:44 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA21733 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:53:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AmK6Y-0001CZ-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:53:42 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AmK5m-00016D-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:52:54 -0500
Received: from toccata.fugue.com ([204.152.186.142]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AmK5M-0000xw-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:52:28 -0500
Received: from [10.0.0.12] (cs241750-189.austin.rr.com [24.175.0.189]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3CE1EFFB1; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:43:20 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20040129155743.02b51c88@flask.cisco.com>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20040129155743.02b51c88@flask.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <6B1F28D9-52A5-11D8-ADDC-000A95D9C74C@fugue.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] RE: draft-ietf-dhc-3315id-for-v4-01.txt
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:52:22 -0600
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Jan 29, 2004, at 3:02 PM, Ralph Droms wrote:
> Looks to me like we're waiting for a new
> revision to continue the discussion.

That's right.   Also, I published an individual submission that I'd 
like the WG to consider before Seoul.   This is about a related issue.  
  I haven't brought it up yet because I wanted to bring it up in 
connection with a discussion about the -02 version of the 3315id draft, 
which I haven't yet had time to prepare.   :'/


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg