[dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7227 (4028)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 27 June 2014 04:32 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299D51B306F for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xtrJ3m3Lv7Mr for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77671B2A7F for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id CEA0C1801C1; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: dhankins@google.com, tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com, msiodelski@gmail.com, jiangsheng@huawei.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com, brian@innovationslab.net, ted.lemon@nominum.com, volz@cisco.com, tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140627043102.CEA0C1801C1@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:31:02 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/_r4LBaplm4BXo531AkYwHomU6cM
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 04:20:03 -0700
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7227 (4028)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 04:32:46 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7227, "Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7227&eid=4028 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> Section: 5.1 Original Text ------------- 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | option-code | option-len | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | ipv6-address | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | ipv6-address | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ... | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 1: Option with IPv6 Addresses Corrected Text -------------- 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | option-code | option-len | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | | ipv6-address | | | | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ : ... : +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Figure 1: Option with IPv6 Addresses Notes ----- Original text shows two IPv6 addresses are required in an option. However, it should be possible to send just one IPv6 address. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7227 (draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-17) -------------------------------------- Title : Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options Publication Date : May 2014 Author(s) : D. Hankins, T. Mrugalski, M. Siodelski, S. Jiang, S. Krishnan Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE Source : Dynamic Host Configuration Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7227 (4028) RFC Errata System
- [dhcwg] [Errata Verified] RFC7227 (4028) RFC Errata System