Re: [dhcwg] Adoption Call for draft-fkhp-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements - Respond by Jan 14, 2020

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Hi,
I support it.  I am not a co-author.

In the past I did work with colleagues on an implementation for Relay 
with PD.

Since then I realized that operators offering Internet access with 
DHCPv6-PD might benefit from a server-relay seggregation to accommodate 
a larger number of users and richer applications.

There might be obstacles in achieving that, however.  These obstacles 
might not come from the DHCPv6 nor PD technology nor DHCP standards. 
They might come from the architecture of IPv6 which still imposes a 64 
limit, which effectively limits the genericity of the prefix length in 
DHCPv6-PD.

I hope these things will advance  hand in hand and wish all the best to 
the pd-relay-requirements draft.

Alex

Le 08/01/2020 à 11:05, [e-mail] a écrit :
> Hi Bernie,
> 
> Thanks for the reminder. I support its adoption (as a co-=author).
> 
> Thanks,
> Ian
> 
>> On 8. Jan 2020, at 02:31, Bernie Volz (volz) <[e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi:
>> A reminder – we are looking for an indication of interest in adopting 
>> this work in the DHC WG, or whether anyone is opposed to it.
>> For the record (with WG chair hat OFF), I support adopting this work. 
>> I think this document would help vendors to supply better products and 
>> improve subscriber experience for networks in which prefix delegation 
>> is used.
>>
>>   * Bernie
>>
>> *From:*dhcwg <[e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>*On Behalf Of*Bernie Volz (volz)
>> *Sent:*Sunday, December 29, 2019 11:03 AM
>> *To:*[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>> *Subject:*[dhcwg] Adoption Call for 
>> draft-fkhp-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements - Respond by Jan 14, 2020
>> Hello:
>> As follow up from the IETF-106 DHC WG meeting, we are initiating the 
>> WG call for adoption 
>> onhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fkhp-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements/ 
>> <https://datatracker.ietf...org/doc/draft-fkhp-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements/>(DHCPv6 
>> Prefix Delegating Relay). This document was presented at IETF-106 – 
>> seehttps://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/slides-106-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-delegating-relay-00.
>> This starts the call for Adoption of this document. Please respond by 
>> January 14, 2020.
>> Thanks in advance for your consideration of whether the WG should or 
>> should not adopt this document as a work item.
>> And, Happy New Year!
>>
>>   * Tomek & Bernie
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>