[dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-05.txt - Passed with Issues
"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Fri, 31 July 2015 14:43 UTC
Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F0A1A894E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aoj8vIdv_LPs for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 690171A8855 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10447; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1438353831; x=1439563431; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=RkLk2H/jMSwS+wh9EpGqLlPRWprJyt4NA1yF5IlP14o=; b=krvuJvUbESc3u7Umv0x6FTGwgIOASIbCleSE3X0snjKaLxBahtKjJnf4 xNty22/lUmmj+HHYh9wXlyFr+EDKpvviUkDLgLXWp+HLzX5phg19WGDir G6TiekuBk2QKC3F3zFXAiTsG0l9lcyW+eP1+mT9+hyF+9OjtYCTeMx3IP E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DYBQARibtV/4gNJK1bgk1NVGkGvAMqCYIEhXkCgTE4FAEBAQEBAQF/C4QjAQEBBC1eARkEAQELHTkUCQkBBBMIiCYNoTylbAEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBAQEBGZAkNweDEoEUBZF2gwIBhHpmiC9Gg1qLNoQ9g2URFYIOHIFTb4FIgQQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,585,1432598400"; d="scan'208,217";a="174051821"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2015 14:43:50 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com [173.36.12.78]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6VEho6q029909 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:43:50 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.177]) by xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com ([173.36.12.78]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:43:50 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-05.txt - Passed with Issues
Thread-Index: AdDLn0/974CurttWR6K5VwDzcIlwNg==
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:43:49 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CB93ED0@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.98.1.198]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CB93ED0xmbrcdx04ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/aR-IN0b__djV6ZyLIUC3ojoqfYE>
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-05.txt - Passed with Issues
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:43:53 -0000
Hi: This is to inform the WG that I (as Tomek is an author) have determined that this document, given its Informational status, has support from the WG to move forward. The WGLC passed. Obviously, a number of issues were raised by reviews (thanks to Marcin and Jinmei) and a revised version will be required before it can advance. Tomek will work with the reviewers to update the document and clear their issues before it will be advanced. If anyone has additional comments, please do provide them. Thanks. - Bernie From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz) Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 5:15 PM To: dhcwg@ietf.org Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-05.txt - Respond by July 29, 2015 Hi all, This message starts the DHC working group last call to advance "Customizing DHCP Configuration on the Basis of Network Topology", draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-05, document as an Informational RFC. The authors believe that this version is ready. We did a WGLC for the 03 draft in October 2014, which raised some issues and resulted in the updates. At that time, we felt the document did not pass WGLC. The draft is available here: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-05 Please send your comments by July 29th, 2015. If you do not feel this document should advance, please state your reasons why. There are no IPR claims reported at this time. Bernie Volz is the assigned shepherd for this document. - Tomek & Bernie
- [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-05.txt … Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-05.… Sunil Gandhewar