Re: [dhcwg] IETF83 dhcwg agenda items

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Mon, 12 March 2012 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED41411E80FA for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.17 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.571, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e0tsh8bvBAVH for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3114F11E80F9 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eaaq11 with SMTP id q11so1534633eaa.31 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-tagtoolbar-keys:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LhoB2GYkaxR3Be62rpqwKkbw3lpNNfA4kAfi6iALDWU=; b=rJBm7jFVqI2lat1MAY3qp2KK4VSu9c09dDCFDX6C7qnE6qLIkTd6yrORxEh9tqJBiY TcGnfkPn1Ks+taeCnpWmdLkT5J4InejffQdsANMVhompSVCK3GK6j3IoZayRZRGenAzG BXwko/KW+zuGEOSm6ooGniOzLIdqu81w5AfRrVrk/O8woEgrefxAh7ZSPWd6PBIW3IG6 f5y093BW6Ks4dSFiaUm50aEyFT1cK7TGRJzD4M5y9mgkXS10SW+oOBQDpUdbYWYOLhD9 n3evYwiKH7WIxorEZ/gNRBTaxMEutWV+YnOiZWNORIxyAiaJoT0yyTKaOrTlCAbTSg7F Xzrg==
Received: by 10.14.127.5 with SMTP id c5mr2105083eei.17.1331585347386; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.100] (host-109-107-11-157.ip.jarsat.pl. [109.107.11.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r44sm16451036eef.2.2012.03.12.13.49.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F5E613E.2050709@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:49:02 +0100
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com>, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
References: <CB83BD44.2298ED%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <CB83BD44.2298ED%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20120312214902846
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IETF83 dhcwg agenda items
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:49:10 -0000

On 12.03.2012 19:48, Brzozowski, John wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> For those of you that have new or existing work that requires time during
> the IETF83 dhcwg  meeting please send us mail with your request.
> 
> If you have already sent us your request please confirm your request,
> apologies for any inconvenience.
I would like to ask for 2 slots for the following drafts:

1. DHCPv6 failover update: 15-30 minutes, depending on time constraints
this can be reasonably brief (just announcing that we have initial
design, layout general ideas) or rather detailed (also present state
machine with states + extra details):
draft-mrugalski-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-requirements-01
draft-mrugalski-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-01

2. Requesting DHCPv6 Suboptions (10 minutes)
draft-mrugalski-dhc-dhcpv6-suboptions-02

Other drafts that I'm involved in (and possibly could present, if
needed) are listed below. I don't plan to present them unless you think
that they should be presented.

3. draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-redundancy-consider-02 (passed WGLC already,
there is nothing to do in WG about this, authors need to update based on
IESG feedback)

4. draft-mdt-softwire-map-dhcp-option-02 (I presented similar work
called 4rd back then in Prague and was told to not present similar stuff
before it is actually adopted by Softwires and that didn't happen yet)

5. draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-04 (that was presented already,
there are changes since -03, but current issues are not related to
DHCP-side of things, but rather related to routing aspects)

Cheers,
Tomek