IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-sarikaya-nvo3-dhc-vxlan-multicast-00.txt

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Thu, 20 February 2014 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3528D1A0149 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:55:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aWeRm60jK_Ao for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:55:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com (mail-lb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485581A0099 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:55:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id p9so1570728lbv.20 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:55:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=USKsVpXQQP/zwmJZGFU8Hp2OgrusdBT9MUXwXWlyPL0=; b=jViRbiWMT5LIqVn2SJhzHnl09oGVrVGyGzduNmca0dQx/QQ9SpZac+Wde+0cZqs825 KIyc2CaRBs2mnxEgpqchom9kUh13oNINBmzqf4U5XhQafFr3qhYGyYXPP6lsSPObBNbf VdfP5Y118dMDOA/FySox8cTG5zG4cIXJL6zZIVGevpX6OlyHDD8dk2iJHO+c+vBw6Iv1 rcZAThPCYWcfXudV33oMxD63YM+EmJoqCkAtyUi+vWuG/xDC4YvKMkzAql4cwi0RXRoB nVnfoCZUqzNm6H0kh+h4qKS9DQqNU6i/RbyZQd7pV/wZ/rOTvGKzKoYrhCqPpbnzOqnD RBug==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.3.99 with SMTP id b3mr1846380lab.61.1392918937929; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.170.195 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 09:55:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2D6D46E6-15C5-4465-843B-3FECA8DC729D@nominum.com>
References: <20140214173114.23812.70162.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC8QAcfGgayrUkXZp4hNdGeZpfv3hazpg4n=2kx8qUHqObhUAg@mail.gmail.com> <2D6D46E6-15C5-4465-843B-3FECA8DC729D@nominum.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:55:37 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcfL9aO4GXNN=g+vioNWvbbQM2Y-GLRf3qZ1cWS3YLpW+g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01419fe27f0ca704f2da3628"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/bBdYdGQEPSF-FE21wvq3hyl92aQ
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Dhc Chairs <dhc-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification for draft-sarikaya-nvo3-dhc-vxlan-multicast-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:55:44 -0000

Hi Ted,


On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Feb 14, 2014, at 12:36 PM, Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > New DHCP options
> >    are defined which allow a VXLAN Tunnel End Point to request any
> >    source multicast address for the newly created virtual machine and
> >    possibly IPv4/IPv6 address(es) for the virtual machine.
>
> This sounds like another set of stateful DHCP options.   Why not just use
> regular DHCP IA_NA or IA_PD?
>
>
I discussed this with my co-author, our latest idea is that your comment
might be referring to this text we have in the abstract:

and possibly IPv4/IPv6 address(es) for the virtual machine.

We mentioned this but did not elaborate on it.
Yes in this case IA_NA or even IA_PD would need to be used.
We will add the text in the next revision, is this OK?

Regards,

Behcet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email