Re: [dhcwg] *DRAFT* agenda for dhc WG meeting

Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> Thu, 05 March 2009 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D203A6A60 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 05:36:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZpzzoidIu7L6 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 05:36:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA473A6B53 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 05:36:41 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,307,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="39095191"
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2009 13:37:10 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n25DbARt031311; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:37:10 -0500
Received: from bxb-rdroms-8711.cisco.com (bxb-rdroms-8711.cisco.com [10.98.10.82]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n25Db9LH006481; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:37:09 GMT
Message-Id: <B8BDB16E-0E8E-4059-B260-D05E7882C8CE@cisco.com>
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <001001c99d97$3b5e5430$0201a8c0@nsnintra.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:37:09 -0500
References: <FC94BFD4-05E0-4534-99E2-EA79C239A813@cisco.com> <C8913227-2AF7-4D13-94EF-11CC2C2A5BEC@cisco.com> <001001c99d97$3b5e5430$0201a8c0@nsnintra.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=507; t=1236260230; x=1237124230; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=rdroms@cisco.com; z=From:=20Ralph=20Droms=20<rdroms@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[dhcwg]=20*DRAFT*=20agenda=20for=20dhc= 20WG=20meeting |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22Hannes=20Tschofenig=22=20<Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.n et>; bh=V3KH1X6+5B8uxL6XdVhF/hh6C5jGNsC0tGamPoXIcn0=; b=Qi6iOndgzoiNnMe1KyDcnTGopVrC9rQYNzXavPWNjWNDXjwOuocz9Nh3Xo 5IPCrtmnZflr5E81xOmFAJ4CnVHeUyTzhK4eJZ6vL/xbK2WXCldBYk7x8sMg Y2NlcQnRCp;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=rdroms@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
Cc: Dhcwg WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] *DRAFT* agenda for dhc WG meeting
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:36:44 -0000

Good catch; should read "Ready for acceptance as WG work item"

- Ralph

On Mar 5, 2009, at 8:35 AM 3/5/09, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:

> Just something I noticed:
>
>> Lightweight DHCPv6 Relay Agent (LDRA)           D. Miles         05
>> minutes
>>  <draft-miles-dhc-dhcpv6-ldra-02>
>>  Ready for WG last call?
>
> Shouldn't it become a WG item first?
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg