IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Re:[dhcwg]Commentsondraft-cadar-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-email-00.txt/draft-cadar-dhc-opt-imap-00.txt

"Bernie Volz" <volz@cisco.com> Thu, 10 March 2005 15:38 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA26215 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:38:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D9Pn1-0005yf-Fv for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:41:31 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D9PjB-0003bw-Bh; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:37:33 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D9Pj9-0003bn-Q7 for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:37:32 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA26097 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:37:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D9Ply-0005x8-0g for dhcwg@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:40:27 -0500
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (64.102.124.13) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2005 10:53:36 -0500
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.90,153,1107752400"; d="scan'208"; a="39987413:sNHT2323948784"
Received: from flask.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@flask.cisco.com [161.44.122.62]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j2AFb3jI010092; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:37:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from volzw2k (che-vpn-cluster-2-171.cisco.com [10.86.242.171]) by flask.cisco.com (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id APS07425; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:37:01 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200503101537.APS07425@flask.cisco.com>
From: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
To: soohong.park@samsung.com, 'Ted Lemon' <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: RE: Re:[dhcwg]Commentsondraft-cadar-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-email-00.txt/draft-cadar-dhc-opt-imap-00.txt
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:36:58 -0500
Organization: Cisco
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
In-Reply-To: <8308643.1110468132691.JavaMail.weblogic@ep_ml09>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Thread-Index: AcUlhYTeKJ6g02ELTAqqmx+MG3Kt2wAAWa/A
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 00e94c813bef7832af255170dca19e36
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 'Cristian Cadar' <Cristian.Cadar@netlab.nec.de>, dhcwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d185fa790257f526fedfd5d01ed9c976
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Why not just use a SRV record in DNS to do this if you really want to offer
this kind of "default" smtp server information.

- Bernie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of Daniel Park
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 10:22 AM
> To: Ted Lemon
> Cc: Cristian Cadar; dhcwg@ietf.org 
> Subject: Re: 
> Re:[dhcwg]Commentsondraft-cadar-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-email-00.txt/dr
aft-cadar-dhc-opt-imap-00.txt
> 
> After taking a look at this draft, I think the author of this document
> should address of why these options should be considered at this time 
> not just figuring option format out. Unfortunately, I didn't see any 
> strong requirements thouth this document at all.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Original Message -------
> Sender : Ted Lemon<mellon@fugue.com>
> Date   : Mar 10, 2005 23:52
> Title  : Re: 
> [dhcwg]Commentsondraft-cadar-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-email-00.txt/draft
-cadar-dhc-opt-imap-00.txt
> On Mar 10, 2005, at 3:35 AM, Cristian Cadar wrote:
> > I think most of the problems arise from the fact that there are
> > not too many available Email applications which can be 
> configured via
> > the OS using the information given by the DHCP client. How 
> frequently
> > this option is used depends on the capabilities of the 
> Email clients 
> > to
> > interact with the DHCP client. This situation might change in the
> > future.
> 
> Then the future is when we should be considering adding an 
> option.   I 
> can't think of any valid application for getting a SMTP server's IP 
> address from a DHCP server, V4 or V6.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Regards   
>  
> Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
> Mobile Platform Laboratory. SAMSUNG Electronics
>  
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email