IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] DHCPv6 RAAN options

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 08 August 2014 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A6C1B2B7E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 08:57:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BSyD1NN2B4za for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 08:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x231.google.com (mail-pd0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D47D1B2B1B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 08:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id p10so7142253pdj.8 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 08:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=tSV5lFM6sdJeYSVCIZRAm2Se9W9OuKLio3hSevYUAM4=; b=VkTYUV0XpXtAWRTY4j5okfLYEPJio1l8eh6LYomq0lSwufCwjl8JiHYnDhko8QDkKD 9AChEITkwb2xGWhMZW7rjWVrfYw8wYKGWfBorq5txDVC96cbfwwQJZp8ONwf2xls83V0 oM0Da48ODL0buUqu09iSB+1QkOVOsZMhMAJDYZEXfxzL5/Ve4hWxPA7rgoYR7aiKhSI1 LnSarPs4TudnLeI2QtIzl65xSpaamVo2oXa4yvXgtUdPGI7nqHOGdz127cz7u3SWIp9B Y2ic3KvRLZxpRDq8kKJ7mQ3dUPq/Q1Q7+6BsAKV8kIEFDUKyV1Rt7Wx9SepUJSFYdiBX k04Q==
X-Received: by 10.66.97.7 with SMTP id dw7mr24877536pab.114.1407513433032; Fri, 08 Aug 2014 08:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.82.101.34] (rtp-isp-nat1.cisco.com. [64.102.254.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm3404443pbw.26.2014.08.08.08.57.10 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Aug 2014 08:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <65C2A9BF-B153-4BD0-89EF-6D7D8FE459B3@nominum.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 11:57:15 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E5A9495C-DC3F-4CA3-8448-F6F510DA587E@gmail.com>
References: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832CECA61@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <83E91E35-3F30-4659-B4AE-58DD11E74DB6@nominum.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832CECB68@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <075FB3EE-EA09-4CBD-AFE9-CF14E77ED007@nominum.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832CECBF5@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <9C369D15-88ED-4E1E-8138-A538760C6FDE@nominum.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832CECC7B@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832CECD1A@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <35F4F6CF-7CBC-4935-9E9F-2EC946D7EBB7@nominum.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831832CED2CD@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <65C2A9BF-B153-4BD0-89EF-6D7D8FE459B3@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/dUKkwaVHCh5kwFw8cutuZWZg0n0
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCPv6 RAAN options
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 15:57:16 -0000

On Aug 8, 2014, at 10:53 AM 8/8/14, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Aug 8, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Templin, Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:
>> Write a little draft that (if approved) updates RFC3315?
> 
> That's the right process, if you can't get this into the 3315bis effort.   But it would have to go through the working group.   I seem to be talking a lot on this topic, but I'm only one working group participant, and not an active participant in the 3315bis effort.   Have any of the 3315bis people been following this discussion?   Do you have thoughts on the matter?

If I recall correctly, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate-04 was not published by the working group because of message transport and ordering concerns: no guarantees that...

...messages containing RAAN options will be delivered in order so that the relay agent takes actions in the correct order
...transactions containing RAAN options will be forwarded through the correct relay agent; e.g., the transaction delegating prefix P to device D might be forwarded through relay agent R1, causing R1 to take action based on that delegation, while the subsequent transaction releasing P might be forwarded through relay agent R2, which has no knowledge of the original delegation

- Ralph

PS I'm working from memory w/o bothering to research the mailing list...
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email