[dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-08.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed, 22 October 2014 20:31 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDC41A1AD9; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3kMowP_Gp20x; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0320F1A1AF5; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.6.4.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20141022203109.15132.28672.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:31:09 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/dp111TMXRqZY1yQ1ZppyxUK828M
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-08.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:31:11 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Dynamic Host Configuration Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Issues and Recommendations with Multiple Stateful DHCPv6 Options
Authors : Ole Troan
Bernie Volz
Marcin Siodelski
Filename : draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-08.txt
Pages : 21
Date : 2014-10-22
Abstract:
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) was not written
with the expectation that additional stateful DHCPv6 options would be
developed. IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration
Protocol (DHCP) version 6 shoe-horned the new options for Prefix
Delegation into DHCPv6. Implementation experience of the CPE model
described in RFC 7084 has shown multiple issues with the DHCPv6
protocol in supporting multiple stateful options. This document
updates RFC 3315 and RFC 3633 to address the identified issues.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-08
A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-08
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-statefu… internet-drafts