IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-reclassify-options-00

"Bernie Volz" <volz@cisco.com> Fri, 09 April 2004 17:02 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA08264 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 13:02:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BBzOf-0001Xa-9l for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 13:02:29 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i39H2TOh005918 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 13:02:29 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BBzOf-0001XN-5w for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 13:02:29 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA08243 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 13:02:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBzOc-0001r7-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 13:02:26 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBzNW-0001eo-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 13:01:18 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBzMR-0001Wx-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 13:00:11 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BBzMG-0001MF-I9; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 13:00:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BBzLP-00016j-Fh for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:59:07 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA08014 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:59:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBzLN-0001QG-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:59:05 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BBzKF-0001I2-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:57:56 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.72] helo=sj-iport-3.cisco.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BBzJ0-00014Z-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:56:38 -0400
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2004 09:05:23 +0000
Received: from flask.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@flask.cisco.com [161.44.122.62]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i39GtqKj001804; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 09:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from volzw2k (sjc-vpn4-400.cisco.com [10.21.81.144]) by flask.cisco.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id AHM48103; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:55:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
To: 'Ralph Droms' <rdroms@cisco.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-reclassify-options-00
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 12:55:49 -0400
Organization: Cisco
Message-ID: <003001c41e53$835c7550$6401a8c0@amer.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20040408083106.02ade250@flask.cisco.com>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ralph:

Thanks for the comments and I've got the updated version ready to go -
but will wait for additional comments during the WG Last Call.

Reminder to WG: this document and several others are in last call which
ends 5PM EST on 4/16/04.

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-admin@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Ralph Droms
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 8:38 AM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] dhc WG last call on
draft-ietf-dhc-reclassify-options-00


This document reflects WG consensus on how to make more DHCP option
codes available to avoid exhaustion of the option code space.

Although there are known uses of option codes in the range 128-254 (both
documented and undocumented), the procedure described in this document
provides a way to avoid clashes in the use of reclassified options.

Editorial suggestions and comments:

The references should be listed as Normative and Informative.

Section 3, change the first sentence to: "The DHCP option space (0-255)
is divided into two ranges [RFC2132]:"

Reference [unused-optioncodes] has been published as RFC 3679.

The document should include boilerplate from RFC 3667 when it is
revised.


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email