Re: [dhcwg] New dhc WG work items
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 19 April 2004 16:19 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA20748 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:19:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFbK2-0003FH-Ss for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:08:39 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i3JG8c1l012467 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:08:38 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFbBs-00019E-9k for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:00:12 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA18635 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:00:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BFbBq-0002DK-VE for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:00:11 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BFbAk-0001wZ-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:59:03 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BFb9g-0001Vz-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:57:56 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFb22-0007dU-Sh; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:50:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BFatN-0005LW-FO for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:41:05 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA17474 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:41:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BFatM-0005VR-AG for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:41:04 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BFasO-0005Gl-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:40:05 -0400
Received: from toccata.fugue.com ([204.152.186.142]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BFarR-00051F-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:39:05 -0400
Received: from [69.136.112.90] (pcp08419874pcs.orovly01.az.comcast.net [69.136.112.90]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96421D0DEE; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:30:37 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1082368749@[10.1.1.109]>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20040416131324.02a67ab0@flask.cisco.com> <2147483647.1082368749@[10.1.1.109]>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <ADC44593-9217-11D8-AE44-000A95D9C74C@fugue.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] New dhc WG work items
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 08:39:00 -0700
To: Martin Stiemerling <stiemerling@netlab.nec.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Apr 19, 2004, at 12:59 AM, Martin Stiemerling wrote: > Probably it is better to take another revision and afterwards decided > again. It was generally agreed that there was work to do. Taking it on as a wg item would allow us to do that work. Taking it on as a wg item doesn't mean it's done and ready for last call! So I'm in favor of taking this on as a work item, and also the other two drafts. _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] New dhc WG work items Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] New dhc WG work items Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [dhcwg] New dhc WG work items Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] New dhc WG work items Bernie Volz