RE: [dhcwg] Minutes from meeting in SLC, 12/10

"Steve Gonczi" <steve@relicore.com> Mon, 07 January 2002 23:21 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA00715 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:21:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id SAA26706 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:21:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA25625; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:04:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA25602 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:04:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from c001.iad.cp.net (c001-h016.c001.iad.cp.net [209.228.6.90]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id SAA00343 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:04:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: (cpmta 22398 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2002 18:04:07 -0500
Received: from 4.36.57.222 (HELO STEVEPC) by smtp.relicore.com (209.228.6.90) with SMTP; 7 Jan 2002 18:04:07 -0500
X-Sent: 7 Jan 2002 23:04:07 GMT
From: Steve Gonczi <steve@relicore.com>
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Minutes from meeting in SLC, 12/10
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 17:59:47 -0500
Message-ID: <BFELJLKGHEJOPOPGJBKKMEEECAAA.steve@relicore.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
In-Reply-To: <200201072133.g07LX5a01736@cichlid.adsl.duke.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I see your point.

As I recall it did not seem reasonable to mandate 
site admin policy. There was a discussion on the WG list
at the time, and we ended up making the _presence_ of this
knob optional.

Perhaps, we should mandate the _support_ of this option
in implementations, and just allow it to be turned off.



>But it is not required so you end up with different products doing
>different things...

/sG

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg