Re: [dhcwg] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-12: (with DISCUSS)
Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Wed, 22 June 2011 15:16 UTC
Return-Path: <presnick@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0DA11E80C4; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.481
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.118, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ygiqYL+3++qC; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D198C11E80BA; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=presnick@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1308755810; x=1340291810; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originating-ip; z=Message-ID:=20<4E020710.1070206@qualcomm.com>|Date:=20We d,=2022=20Jun=202011=2010:15:28=20-0500|From:=20Pete=20Re snick=20<presnick@qualcomm.com>|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0 =20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B =20en-US=3B=20rv:1.9.1.9)=20Gecko/20100630=20Eudora/3.0.4 |MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Ralph=20Droms=20<rdroms.ietf@g mail.com>|CC:=20Adrian=20Farrel=20<adrian@olddog.co.uk>, =20"dhcwg@ietf.org=20WG"=20<dhcwg@ietf.org>,=0D=0A=09Chai rs=20Dhc=20<dhc-chairs@tools.ietf.org>,=0D=0A=09<draft-ie tf-dhc-subnet-alloc@tools.ietf.org>,=20The=20IESG=20<iesg @ietf.org>|Subject:=20Re:=20Adrian=20Farrel's=20Discuss =20on=20draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-12:=20(with=0D=0A=20D ISCUSS)|References:=20<20110621133345.30498.22812.idtrack er@ietfa.amsl.com>=20<75C2AABE-D308-446D-97E2-819C1767D14 D@gmail.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<75C2AABE-D308-446D-97E2-819C 1767D14D@gmail.com>|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20chars et=3D"ISO-8859-1"=3B=20format=3Dflowed |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit|X-Originating-IP:=20[1 72.30.39.5]; bh=cAfkag9CIpOuG/F7B1EPgA9tdsTvhCe7JavBqmdVkjo=; b=Ow+5PGpkQ8TYlIT0rLzmKNMLoHDNG0KUrci8709bdyNmv5v8hBpzRpvp Az/u9w2wYd/L0Eu/b/sTp0uW8Y6QT+SkoyAS5l0lJxPF8YZ/NdswNspW7 9SalTxlrBBAxLDq68jyM6T7DDRdkszwml2SgukCjxMYQZ0wgdwi7dBMqJ I=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6384"; a="99363659"
Received: from ironmsg03-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.17]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 22 Jun 2011 08:15:31 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,406,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="81095176"
Received: from nasanexhc08.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.7]) by Ironmsg03-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 22 Jun 2011 08:15:31 -0700
Received: from Macintosh-4.local (172.30.39.5) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:15:31 -0700
Message-ID: <4E020710.1070206@qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:15:28 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <20110621133345.30498.22812.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <75C2AABE-D308-446D-97E2-819C1767D14D@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <75C2AABE-D308-446D-97E2-819C1767D14D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.39.5]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 08:24:34 -0700
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Chairs Dhc <dhc-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc@tools.ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-12: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:16:51 -0000
Certainly not my preferred approach. I still don't quite understand why this isn't simply going for Proposed Standard. pr On 6/21/11 7:52 PM, Ralph Droms wrote: > Addressing Adrian's DISCUSS, which relates closely to Pete's DISCUSS and Peter's COMMENT, I suggest that the document be retitled along the lines of Adrian's suggestion, "Description of Cisco Systems' Subnet Allocation Option for DHCP" to clarify the content of the document. > > - Ralph > > On Jun 21, 2011, at 9:33 AM 6/21/11, Adrian Farrel wrote: > > >> Adrian Farrel has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc-12: Discuss >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> DISCUSS: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I'm afraid I agree with Pete's Discuss so strongly that I will raise it as my own Discuss. >> >> Either this document should be recast as "Description of Cisco Systems' Subnet Allocation Option for DHCP" (in which case Informational is acceptable) such that it is obvious what and why people might be implementing. Or it should be put on to the Standards Track. >> >> For the avoidance of doubt, I do not object to documents describing what is in the field and allowing people to decide to interoperate with that. In particular, in the 3942 context, this is good and proper. But I do not like the way this document sits on the fence between defining "a new DHCP option" and being Informaitonal. >> >> >> >> >> > -- Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
- Re: [dhcwg] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [dhcwg] Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf… Pete Resnick