IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Mail regarding draft-gandhewar-dhc-v6-relay-initiated-release and draft-gandhewar-dhc-relay-initiated-release

Sunil Gandhewar <sgandhewar@juniper.net> Tue, 25 August 2015 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <sgandhewar@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3E61AD291 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:36:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X1oZZ9heIRfe for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0107.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A521AD272 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:36:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR0501MB1043.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.35.142) by BLUPR0501MB1041.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.35.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.243.23; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 02:36:48 +0000
Received: from BLUPR0501MB1043.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.35.142]) by BLUPR0501MB1043.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.35.142]) with mapi id 15.01.0243.020; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 02:36:47 +0000
From: Sunil Gandhewar <sgandhewar@juniper.net>
To: Dan Seibel <Dan.Seibel@TELUS.COM>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mail regarding draft-gandhewar-dhc-v6-relay-initiated-release and draft-gandhewar-dhc-relay-initiated-release
Thread-Index: AdDeidbaiDep0tBGTsK/KZLgv5EAXgAVI8EA
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 02:36:47 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR0501MB104376F6CE83D55AB1F48C22C2610@BLUPR0501MB1043.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <D200A175.74D22%dan.seibel@telus.com>
In-Reply-To: <D200A175.74D22%dan.seibel@telus.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=sgandhewar@juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.12]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR0501MB1041; 5:21R5Muq8F4uOIl2d4vWA5dOrL3oQrNQxeLoL+WB5dcRBuSz+JgbHpRsI4OwdL6+Sm3fr8ltiHtRjyV3M/OMcCIkA9cOg+z7oZELC7mNEcqCr5KDQHxZNtQh/ltPFQKeaGpweJJZSnYBsnUwdn4f9fQ==; 24:s5y3cmVqENj9qLoRQ+wnhE+ik7X1FwNHZ0aSOqA4OGlnb6qhi7AlXr6zJcmhe2VtseFbgRzezffnM+fuQ7e3UcekFnK3Vjx6PEA/piZm0xE=; 20:jl8lfnQ7yyzATr/RmUMKa41VU9EllCdwqsCpUsZ8zMfWt50pJFumXxu3HM2jJGurcitzjeSgOJN5t3N1EW1CMw==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1041;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR0501MB10414C8437AA48AA13F6F596C2610@BLUPR0501MB1041.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(108003899814671);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1041; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1041;
x-forefront-prvs: 06793E740F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(189002)(377454003)(199003)(2501003)(33656002)(16236675004)(2900100001)(19625215002)(76176999)(106356001)(2950100001)(105586002)(76576001)(92566002)(122556002)(15975445007)(50986999)(230783001)(101416001)(18717965001)(54356999)(5002640100001)(10400500002)(102836002)(40100003)(2656002)(64706001)(68736005)(19300405004)(5007970100001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(77096005)(46102003)(97736004)(5004730100002)(4001540100001)(5001830100001)(107886002)(86362001)(5001920100001)(66066001)(81156007)(5001770100001)(99286002)(74316001)(77156002)(62966003)(5003600100002)(87936001)(5001960100002)(5001860100001)(189998001)(19609705001)(110136002)(4001430100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR0501MB1041; H:BLUPR0501MB1043.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BLUPR0501MB104376F6CE83D55AB1F48C22C2610BLUPR0501MB1043_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 Aug 2015 02:36:47.8726 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0501MB1041
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/kPTp2s_JKPJv6i3O_Zsam8aCRRw>
Cc: Sunil Gandhewar <sgandhewar@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Mail regarding draft-gandhewar-dhc-v6-relay-initiated-release and draft-gandhewar-dhc-relay-initiated-release
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 02:36:52 -0000

Thanks Dan for the support.
Yes, we had many hiccups due to different solutions from different vendors which leads to different state at relay and server for a client. Then it takes lot's of administrative effort to bring them back in sync. I am glad you recall this.

Regards,
Sunil Gandhewar
Juniper Networks, Inc.
sgandhewar@juniper.net


From: Dan Seibel [mailto:Dan.Seibel@TELUS.COM]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 9:58 PM
To: Sunil Gandhewar
Cc: draft-gandhewar-dhc-v6-relay-initiated-release@ietf.org; draft-gandhewar-dhc-relay-initiated-release@ietf.org; dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Mail regarding draft-gandhewar-dhc-v6-relay-initiated-release and draft-gandhewar-dhc-relay-initiated-release

I know ALU and it looks like Juniper both have their own method to have the relay send releases on behalf of the client, however it would be nice to have a more vendor-agnostic and reliable method to accomplish this.  I have certainly seen cases where the dhcp server and relay become out of sync (for whatever reason) which always leads to interesting troubleshooting issues.  I fully support anything to help keep the dhcp server and relay agent(s) in sync!



____________________________________________
Dan Seibel, P.Eng
Sr. Engineer, Broadband Services Development
Chief Technology Office
TELUS
T +1 780 508 2286 | M +1 780 887 1743

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email