IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] IETF-106 DHC WG Draft Minutes

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 06 December 2019 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC1B12012E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 11:26:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QcvEsocQYA2v for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 11:26:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C39012006D for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 11:26:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10051; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1575660364; x=1576869964; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=8o7hGM1XRiJR3V9F6N73udlXRiiTFpYFXa5jxSyTD8k=; b=Dg2t3CDuhn15mhVXRLnmT/NxncvoBp+FARmlziI4UG/UnbVprwkw4VYQ 4rTVnAXIFhhiiM888OBKsCh9KDSqOOBngnkQo/HHfgnK2TKTqS5NS3FTP jKQc2Wo2Dk5kZOjL0VBcrIIt2BfdIKt4/6dAcYQs2rE+dBefYZ8yWynC8 4=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 488
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,285,1571702400"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="396687340"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 06 Dec 2019 19:26:02 +0000
Received: from [10.154.160.175] ([10.154.160.175]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xB6JPwB4006664 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Dec 2019 19:26:00 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <74CB2FBD-7760-490A-A586-7249A632C887@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_426A29A8-762B-49EE-B800-46944E7CEC3D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:25:57 -0800
In-Reply-To: <F3A02107-2543-4F55-A36F-7157C211D154@gmx.com>
Cc: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
To: ianfarrer@gmx.com
References: <DM6PR11MB4137AC0EFA9DB414B80B2F9ECF430@DM6PR11MB4137.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <F3A02107-2543-4F55-A36F-7157C211D154@gmx.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.154.160.175, [10.154.160.175]
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/kz5zDEw9VfvOf8wVjVSaZtDpwAE>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IETF-106 DHC WG Draft Minutes
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 19:26:09 -0000


> On 2 Dec 2019, at 07:54, ianfarrer@gmx.com wrote:
> 
> Hi Bernie,
> 
> Thanks for posting them. A couple of comments:
> 
> 1 question regarding draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-yang - Do we know who volunteered to review?

I don’t know who volunteered in the meeting, but I can review after the beginning of the year.

Eliot

> 
> 1 comment regarding draft-fkhp-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements - For the point about the use of RFC2119 language, I noted during that Suresh advised putting the draft back to standards track to solve this, but this is not recorded in the minutes.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ian
> 
>> On 2. Dec 2019, at 16:13, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com <mailto:volz@cisco.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi:
>> 
>> I have published DRAFT minutes for the IETF-106 DHC WG session – seehttps://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/minutes-106-dhc-00 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/minutes-106-dhc-00>.
>> 
>> They have been reviewed by your co-chairs, but we welcome corrections or other changes.
>> 
>> Bernie & Tomek
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email