Re: [dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3633 (1880)

Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> Wed, 16 September 2009 00:10 UTC

Message-Id: <CEEBB409-2C64-444E-8C76-3DD2E52C2D58@cisco.com>
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <200909152357.n8FNvu19016727@boreas.isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:11:30 -0400
References: <200909152357.n8FNvu19016727@boreas.isi.edu>
Cc: ot@cisco.com, Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>, Yukiyo.Akisada@jp.yokogawa.com, ted.lemon@nominum.com, dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3633 (1880)
Precedence: list

This errata report is correct and should be accepted as submitted.

- Ralph

On Sep 15, 2009, at 7:57 PM 9/15/09, RFC Errata System wrote:

>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3633,
> "IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)  
> version 6".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3633&eid=1880
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Yukiyo Akisada <Yukiyo.Akisada@jp.yokogawa.com>
>
> Section: 9
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>   If a delegating router receives an IA_PD with T1 greater than T2,  
> and
>   both T1 and T2 are greater than 0, the delegating router ignores the
>   invalid values of T1 and T2 and processes the IA_PD as though the
>   delegating router had set T1 and T2 to 0.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   If a delegating router receives an IA_PD with T1 greater than T2,  
> and
>   both T1 and T2 are greater than 0, the delegating router ignores the
>   invalid values of T1 and T2 and processes the IA_PD as though the
>   requesting router had set T1 and T2 to 0.
>
> Notes
> -----
>
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC3633 (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-prefix-delegation-05)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host  
> Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6
> Publication Date    : December 2003
> Author(s)           : O. Troan, R. Droms
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Dynamic Host Configuration
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

Re: [dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3633 (… Ralph Droms
[dhcwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3633 (1880) RFC Errata System