Re: [dhcwg] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-05
"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Mon, 25 May 2020 15:43 UTC
Return-Path: <evyncke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F563A0D3F; Mon, 25 May 2020 08:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=P1J0++Xr; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=kZrLMgIw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g9PbuUPbIR0g; Mon, 25 May 2020 08:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F11BA3A0D36; Mon, 25 May 2020 08:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4418; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1590421399; x=1591630999; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=hBrV05usj79bVSW6bLrJ1CQHu7FKASgj/QTG1ZR+560=; b=P1J0++Xr+Qf+bOQyciv6GtgVFCX1bLVpbCO4hgSAaQ8O2ILp0xFRsvGv YjEfswPeD5hh/YcN5VmqkeL9+Gqiow5qCd2sdVLmY9M+lFfrOu/e68JQh zPOJPCACdqKu3OvU38R+kzjmOGB1eiwu5SQ5zZkeNjSQ8ClA4b7pDG8VY Y=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:dFxD7hH0fb+Lo+OXAOIou51GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7IYmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e401QObVoTA4PUCgO3T4OjsWm0FtJCGtn1KMJlBTAQMhshemQs8SNWEBkv2IL+PDWQ6Ec1OWUUj8yS9Nk5YS83/fFbV5Ha16G1aFhD2LwEgIOPzF8bbhNi20Obn/ZrVbk1IiTOxbKk0Ig+xqFDat9Idhs1pLaNixw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BrBwCK5ste/5xdJa1mHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQFAgUeBVFEHgUcvLIQlg0YDjRsliXqOQoFCgRADVQsBAQEMAQEtAgQBAYFQgnQCF4IKJDgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQUEbYVWDIVyAQEBAQMSBgsEDQwBATcBCwQCAQgRAwECAwIRFQICAh8RFQgIAgQBDQUbB4MEgkwDLgGhZQKBOYhhdn8zgwEBAQWFIA0Lgg4JgQ4qgmSJYBqBQT+BEScMEIJNPoIegWkvGD+CVTOCLZFmoE0tSgqCVJQABIRYHZ4ChSSLKow6kSgCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWkigT4RB3AVZQGCPlAYDZBAg3KKVnQ3AgYBBwEBAwl8jFwBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,433,1583193600"; d="scan'208";a="763556232"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 25 May 2020 15:43:17 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 04PFhIIv020171 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 25 May 2020 15:43:18 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 25 May 2020 10:43:17 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 25 May 2020 10:43:17 -0500
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 25 May 2020 10:43:17 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=gACXpEpcOtM3z1k2D1vKZt++ep6KaEWBS8J18QEouGlOmcBFMt7qbfzeTVJAgB4rLt12S2Myd6lppnA9B38tM9AMYiZ/kozTSST6S2uxw19geVGSIuc59sHnqsKw75TqLuKJuwqdMVLNV+/SKBDzozCB1PT5URQeYaSAp+rsWNARfCB2Di2YDQVByxn25A+3MTJ+hKttRynk9Bc4Ott4vF3AdTRIaIQkOKIHvQkOe+0eCGW4Tfn87efilhsxOPb9eliG8Jzbp3q4+IZtvG7Zln8S5yL90/5Nj/jFqEM3Y8KvKN4vR0JTnX2xG4T0Z0eVIUoiGSKX7y1ryw8qAQW2mQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hBrV05usj79bVSW6bLrJ1CQHu7FKASgj/QTG1ZR+560=; b=R2uzRJQjEt0UT7S19f6Fg3Jw9kJy8eo6ixTlEBwlajgOMJmiDFXWBwfv0g1UAKbIRSJtBFDDmM+xlQC2nkfop7hZbSoL/SOeoIm8oWM1B/GxiWSR/mrLkRLs2lVOqmr1xnKm01LWimzpp+YsfI3XwJEpEjrWNJJDq1E+n08eVjR3Uu5j8PVxAFcXgEWTBCxLcuDcwhyZ3OR1H9T8GFYkbjVwyjkwuyv0d/EIpIfdOVQ76BrHrhC6C3YaZgkGcyYE6msg5u4QCWxSj6rI5dbw+iHysKdSTIt2hHWAp8/Peax33NASImA6pxAU3ed4XzGRJGEUzso7j4P0+Up9TJM5fg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hBrV05usj79bVSW6bLrJ1CQHu7FKASgj/QTG1ZR+560=; b=kZrLMgIwARxRfF5Denf6JRrbkkiCXDOFDo4K72mPpKC2EF6odEVk7XDioVhGZzcY2yJ1XnEzaKy7vU/E2rYd80b1I5PGH+o70ZXO+Pt2laaL9DOQoBUs/VrUnfpPybDay4S9ts7SonyjhPlbqm3Bzk5NWuQKnsMqFplbCjZH5us=
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:10d::13) by DM5PR11MB1481.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:4:9::12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3021.23; Mon, 25 May 2020 15:43:16 +0000
Received: from DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a14c:59b6:47b0:f630]) by DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a14c:59b6:47b0:f630%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3021.029; Mon, 25 May 2020 15:43:16 +0000
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: "Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <naikumar@cisco.com>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-05
Thread-Index: AQHWMqV0fQK5LoECJUeXRZ18jWwWVqi5EqSA
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 15:43:16 +0000
Message-ID: <DD3517A6-4F35-4462-B26F-1987172A4ABD@cisco.com>
References: <159041889027.19956.502386482709566675@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <159041889027.19956.502386482709566675@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.37.20051002
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c1:36:18b7:1fd9:35f3:95dc]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d26a5f24-185b-4bbd-38fa-08d800c25781
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR11MB1481:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR11MB1481A6A034BCADE42A82594DA9B30@DM5PR11MB1481.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0414DF926F
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: lJCJjXuPiXyzFy0Uj8lYRj8rweRo4u6AfgdSIdMxVa6Cc1iDsfD4+tvPgtmacWlZjwIMg20GNTOmKI2SfTwiAV3DfElWSJUgKoc2FfNsSo+eenwP1kMXuJWl1Z7yUDK7NvWtQzOWp2ObZmO0ws0lxI5rQW/eejF55UHVWZ5FS4I76heqrwt2VXRr8P3E9fZTmL3gPJTF+prmp7Sa7beN2D0CjsmKU1SyAiFgizp23N3pDdRbcW0K93JWg0hVt/vn7W+PITHb3NETjYSKRdwZh4ek7lrfYJyFpUY2NYG2S5dJs8/EMnIepVflzNx0pmYQHfeG1TEOFoJrS5riLaxliQ==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM5PR11MB1753.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(376002)(366004)(8676002)(6486002)(66476007)(54906003)(5660300002)(478600001)(76116006)(66556008)(66446008)(64756008)(91956017)(8936002)(2906002)(66946007)(86362001)(33656002)(186003)(6512007)(316002)(450100002)(71200400001)(6506007)(53546011)(110136005)(2616005)(36756003)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <98DDADF6958E034DAE0E519B05FFCF6A@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d26a5f24-185b-4bbd-38fa-08d800c25781
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 25 May 2020 15:43:16.3567 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: HA8Z9pBWx1hmPsIvR++cy5UHZ9hdjAjVb7srMgdmN7Q76JBCIggc+TXvhoQSIWtN+W3CId+YTo3TA3+MMbOo3w==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR11MB1481
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/pSFGqgNJc0lkhbnL7TIQkkDfw5U>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-05
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 15:43:21 -0000
Thank you Nagendra for your review. I am taking it in account for the next steps. -éric -----Original Message----- From: Nagendra Nainar via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Reply-To: "Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" <naikumar@cisco.com> Date: Monday, 25 May 2020 at 17:02 To: "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org> Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org> Subject: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-05 Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org> Resent-To: <rengang@cernet.edu.cn>, <he-l14@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>, <liuying@cernet.edu.cn>, <volz@cisco.com>, <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, Eric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com> Resent-Date: Monday, 25 May 2020 at 17:01 Reviewer: Nagendra Nainar Review result: Has Issues Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts per guidelines in RFC5706. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Overall Summary: This draft is attempting to summarize the problems related to the current practice for extending DHCPv6 protocol. This document does not propose any solution, framework, or protocol extensions and so it does not raise any backward compatibility challenges or operational considerations. While the document does not raise any operational/management considerations, I am choosing "Has Issues" as the overall draft may need substantial changes. Few comments below: The manageability, security, privacy protection, and traceability of networks can be supported by extending the DHCPv6 protocol according to requirements. This document provides current extension practices and typical DHCPv6 server softwares on extensions, defines a DHCPv6 general model, discusses some extension points, and presents extension cases. --> The abstract is not clear in reflecting what the draft is about. Based on the above, this draft appears to be discussing current extension practice, extension points, and cases which is more like a survey document that summarizes what we have currently. This being a draft that attempts to document the problem statement, it will be good to reflect the same in the abstract. --> The Introduction section may need some rework. It is not clear in defining what is multi-requirement extension problem. --> I think, a section (or sub-section) clarifying what is multi-requirement extension with an example use case will help the readers to better understand the objective of this document. Regards, Nagendra
- [dhcwg] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc… Nagendra Nainar via Datatracker
- Re: [dhcwg] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [dhcwg] [OPS-DIR] Opsdir last call review of … Warren Kumari