IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC - draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-12 - Respond by July 15

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 11 July 2013 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4BE21F9E9E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eZD3FAckJ4Y8 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22b.google.com (mail-qc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A3921F92BB for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id n1so4638221qcw.30 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=S05K7VSCdA1PmbhdQGGZR/p+ZQC1h2RqrRu1ohw5oWg=; b=MSrQLQdGzYeM4BnM2FTp3vio9AGHwCcIgik3bMOBeaJYDb672dnE/FC4UeOMUOwZHl ENajrs/jHlLAjT79FFHo/AAgi2u9YLR3HnOcOgcQW1oZiSryQ+PfVUMTYRRoAkBd6rTj BnnYSvrpGVVF43PqFvS+35roVEBhjsbzp0ZfwGCNRSGFUAbq4dHqYkxhprkcFZXHCklS NwDLQH/j4zpV7nPUkFk0zLxxGo1RtCc+wucAmSu3Me705zpCoeiIHx+71sl5XO3BZsMr cxL3/VBpzCkeb7l0sraNWVb6gEoPnelbIhj5tGEcLLoUrbIfaJ4ubNxI5pZcx/DNRgQ0 5egw==
X-Received: by 10.49.104.35 with SMTP id gb3mr31716362qeb.77.1373572583543; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:2481:20:58ff:687a:8198:1172? ([2001:420:2481:20:58ff:687a:8198:1172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ng3sm30575578qeb.0.2013.07.11.12.56.21 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E185CDA1C@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:56:19 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <63C6843B-FE39-4A3D-A83B-F1EA1664DC31@gmail.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E185CDA1C@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
To: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC - draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-12 - Respond by July 15
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:56:25 -0000

Looks about ready to publish.  Some comments:

Title of section 10: "Additional States Considered Harmful"  I suggest s/States/State/.  At first, I thought this referred to client states as in DHCPv4.  The text in section 10 clearly refers to state added to the various kinds of state the server maintains to manage clients.

In section 13, what is a "fragment type"?  The word fragment appears (once) previously in section 5, but I don't have a clue what a "fragment type" might be.

Add citations to RFC 2131 and RFC 2132 for the references to DHCPv4?

- Ralph

On Jul 1, 2013, at 5:44 PM 7/1/13, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:

> The draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-12, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-12, addresses the comments from the previous (-11) last call. While originally I expected to have a short (1 week) last call for the updated document, I think it best to have the standard 2 weeks given the time of year (and the Independence Day holiday in the US).
>  
> Please review the draft and indicate whether or not you feel this version is ready to be published. Your response matters to the process, so please do respond.
>  
> Do note: While I encourage full reviews, the main focus is to assure we have consensus on the recent changes from the -11. The -11 WGLC support will be taken into consideration.
>  
> As Tomek is an author, I will evaluate consensus after July 15, 2013.
>  
> -          Bernie
>  
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email