[dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3633 (2469)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 17 August 2010 11:17 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B563D3A6903 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.274, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LbIKkAzEqClN for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20723A6803 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E00F0E06B1; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: ot@cisco.com, rdroms@cisco.com, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net, ted.lemon@nominum.com, john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20100817111811.E00F0E06B1@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 04:18:11 -0700
Cc: ot@cisco.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3633 (2469)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:17:36 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3633, "IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3633&eid=2469 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com> Section: 11.1 Original Text ------------- The requesting router MUST ignore any Advertise message that includes a Status Code option containing the value NoPrefixAvail, with the exception that the requesting router MAY display the associated status message to the user. Corrected Text -------------- The requesting router MUST ignore any IA_PDs in an Advertise message that includes a Status Code option containing the value NoPrefixAvail, with the exception that the requesting router MAY display the associated status message to the user. Notes ----- Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC3633 (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-prefix-delegation-05) -------------------------------------- Title : IPv6 Prefix Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) version 6 Publication Date : December 2003 Author(s) : O. Troan, R. Droms Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Dynamic Host Configuration Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3633 (2469) RFC Errata System