Re: [dhcwg] Vendor Message Drafts

On Thursday 05 March 2009, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
> 2nd request to start DHC WG last call.
>
> Or, does anyone have any objections?

I've read this draft and it looks fine to me. Thanks for taking the time to 
write it.

- Bud

>
> - Bernie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Bernie Volz (volz)
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 5:53 PM
> To: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: [dhcwg] Vendor Message Drafts - Please Review / Start WG Last
> Call?
>
> On 1/22, the updated (and now WG work item) DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 vendor
> message drafts were submitted:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-vendor-message
> -00.txt
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-vendor-message
> -00.txt
>
> The major change over the previous (individual submission) versions was
> that the vendor data now has a specific format instead of being up to
> the vendor. That format for the vendor data is now:
> 	octet of vendor-msg-type
> 	zero or more octets of vendor-specific options data
>
> This does allow for Wireshark and similar tools to provide some basic
> level of decoding - and it is always possible to add vendor-specific
> decoding (via catalog of vendor messages and option definitions).
>
> Please review as I'd like to request that we do a DHC WG Last Call on
> these documents unless there are issues?
>
> - Bernie
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

-- 
Bud Millwood
Weird Solutions, Inc.
http://www.weird-solutions.com
tel: +46 8 758 3700
fax: +46 8 758 3687

Re: [dhcwg] Vendor Message Drafts - Please Review / Start WG Last Call?