[dhcwg] RE: draft-ietf-dhc-server-mib-08
"Barr Hibbs" <rbhibbs@pacbell.net> Fri, 28 November 2003 20:39 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA10687 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:39:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1APpOb-0004UF-5N for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:39:22 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hASKdLGn017241 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:39:21 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1APpOb-0004U0-1h for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:39:21 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA10650 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:39:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1APpOZ-000196-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:39:19 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1APpOZ-000192-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:39:19 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1APpOG-0004Sm-Mr; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:39:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1APpNK-0004OI-Ra for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:38:03 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA10592 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:37:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1APpNI-00017i-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:38:00 -0500
Received: from smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.34]) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1APpNI-00015x-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:38:00 -0500
Received: from adsl-64-169-90-78.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO BarrH63p601) (rbhibbs@pacbell.net@64.169.90.78 with login) by smtp1.mail.vip.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2003 20:37:28 -0000
Reply-To: rbhibbs@pacbell.net
From: Barr Hibbs <rbhibbs@pacbell.net>
To: gww@nortelnetworks.com, stefaan.de_cnodder@alcatel.be
Cc: Dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 12:38:07 -0800
Message-ID: <KIEPLODFDDAMBAJNDFPCAEIIFNAA.rbhibbs@pacbell.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <3FBCE1C5.B7E2A99D@alcatel.be>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [dhcwg] RE: draft-ietf-dhc-server-mib-08
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
comments in-line --Barr > -----Original Message----- > From: stefaan.de_cnodder@alcatel.be > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 07:46 > > I have a question on draft-ietf-dhc-server-mib-08: > > 1) In the SharedNetTable and the SubnetTable, I see low and > high tresholds. Is this not redundant? > ...no, this is to prevent hysteresis, or constant "on/off" notifications while the value of free addresses hovers around a single threshold value. > Also in the notifications, I only see those of the SharedNetTable > and not those of the SubnetTable. > ...because a shared network segment can be composed of multiple subnetworks, we felt that a notification was necessary only if the shared network segment free address counter passed through the low and high threshold point. > 2) Should such thresholds also be added in the RangeTable? > ...no, because the RangeTable describes a subdivision of a subnet, and we felt that it was appropriate to only trigger notifications at the subnet level. > 3) last word in the description of the high theshold: events > will be generated again when the number of available > addresses becomes equal to or less than the value of the > *low* threshold, while the draft says *high* threshold. > ...good catch! Note to Glenn: the draft I just sent for your concurrence is lacking this change, but will be included when I submit the draft to the I-D editor, hopefully Monday. --rbh _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] RE: draft-ietf-dhc-server-mib-08 Barr Hibbs