[dhcwg] Updated draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-01.txt

"Bernie Volz \(volz\)" <volz@cisco.com> Sun, 05 March 2006 23:53 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FG32p-00036V-VK; Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:53:47 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FG32o-00036P-9F for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:53:46 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FG32n-0006su-UM for dhcwg@ietf.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:53:46 -0500
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.223.137]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2006 15:53:46 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.02,166,1139212800"; d="scan'208"; a="1782070405:sNHT35854408"
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k25Nrh1j007694; Sun, 5 Mar 2006 15:53:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.15]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sun, 5 Mar 2006 18:53:43 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:53:42 -0500
Message-ID: <8E296595B6471A4689555D5D725EBB21014DD090@xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Updated draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-01.txt
Thread-Index: AcZAsAhIfaleCVvfTtavjiBuTJ4ZvA==
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2006 23:53:43.0388 (UTC) FILETIME=[08DED1C0:01C640B0]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b5d20af10c334b36874c0264b10f59f1
Cc: "Mark Townsley (townsley)" <townsley@cisco.com>, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Subject: [dhcwg] Updated draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

Hello:

I have just submitted
ftp://ftpeng.cisco.com/volz/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid-01.txt to
hopefully address the IESG discuss items
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=print_ballot
&ballot_id=1836&filename=draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-subid).

The differences of significance from the -00 draft are below.

- Bernie

---
 
-   The subscriber-id is an NVT ASCII [4] string.  The semantic contents
-   of the subscriber-id field are of course provider-specific.  This
-   specification does not establish any semantic requirements on the
-   data in the string.
+   The subscriber-id information is only intended for use within a
+   single administrative domain and is only exchanged between the relay
+   agents and DHCPv6 servers within that domain.  Therefore, the format
+   of and encoding of the data in the option is not standardized and
+   this specification does not establish any semantic requirements on
+   the data.  This specification only defines the option for conveying
+   this information from relay agents to DHCPv6 servers.
+
+   However, as the DHCPv4 Subscriber-ID suboption [4] specifies NVT
+   ASCII [5] encoded data, in environments where both DHCPv4 [6] and
+   DHCPv6 are being used, it MAY be beneficial to use that encoding.
 
---
 
-         subscriber-id    A NVT ASCII string. It MUST NOT be null
-                          terminated.
+         subscriber-id    The subscriber's identity.
 
---

 4.  DHCPv6 Relay Agent Behavior
 
    DHCPv6 relay agents MAY be configured to include a Subscriber-ID
-   option in relayed (RELAY-FORW) DHCPv6 messages.  The subscriber-id
-   strings themselves are assigned and configured through mechanisms
-   that are outside the scope of this memo.
+   option in relayed (RELAY-FORW) DHCPv6 messages.  How the
+   subscriber-id is assigned and the mechanisms used to configure it
are
+   outside the scope of this memo.
+
 
 5.  DHCPv6 Server Behavior
 
    This option provides additional information to the DHCPv6 server.
-   The DHCPv6 server, if it is configured to support this option, MAY
-   use this information in addition to other relay agent option data,
-   other options included in the DHCPv6 client messages, and physical
-   network topology information in order to assign IP addresses,
-   delegate prefixes, and/or other configuration parameters to the
-   client.  There is no special additional processing for this option.
+   The DHCPv6 server MAY use this information, if available, in
addition
+   to other relay agent option data, other options included in the
+   DHCPv6 client messages, and physical network topology information in
+   order to assign IP addresses, delegate prefixes, and/or other
+   configuration parameters to the client.  There is no special

--- 
6.  Security Considerations
 
-   See [1] section 21.1, on securing DHCPv6 messages sent between
-   servers and relay agents, and section 23, on general DHCPv6 security
-   considerations.
+   As the subscriber-id option is only exchanged between relay agents
+   and DHCPv6 servers, [1] section 21.1, provides details on securing
+   DHCPv6 messages sent between servers and relay agents.  And, [1]
+   section 23, provides general DHCPv6 security considerations.
 
---
 
-   [4]  Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Protocol Specification",
-        STD 8, RFC 854, May 1983.
-
-   [5]  Johnson, R., Palaniappan, T., and M. Stapp, "Subscriber-ID
+   [4]  Johnson, R., Palaniappan, T., and M. Stapp, "Subscriber-ID
         Suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)
         Relay Agent Option", RFC 3993, March 2005.
 
+   [5]  Postel, J. and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Protocol Specification",
+        STD 8, RFC 854, May 1983.
+
+   [6]  Droms, R., "Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol", RFC 2131,
+        March 1997.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg