Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-load-balancing-01: Passed

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Fri, 11 April 2014 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86AB1A072E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0LJHhMSVftEj for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ee0-x22d.google.com (mail-ee0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325931A0738 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ee0-f45.google.com with SMTP id d17so4430188eek.32 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z5YffJFRdx3zcXWYDNQtRksMUuTgGsUm78Y+X/zoXsE=; b=d2tUho2ZlPWiofOku/r8/jkG9iuwtvyhAcFd3YnPTxqhJPaD+VrjNREiSZmsvdW7Uq vI5eBwWVI/6J7WxFRkazAR48YEqYEHLh4DVQ1palWw25YeNYydA380cJMEB5mpAcK36k 52su4orE84HaH4SfNDhlP4rkaZ0SzLaQDGZ0uplRVlnXKgO6mHZvOWwHWw/hyW32YbM0 VlpWJzdtNH6Fbdaea5ZKItgq10pxPUjSLpf6Q1ypaPyU4RsGX8cOvcFDdsz9o8tbLyHQ e+EtxPkFPip7ywtIpoJwqRN4GqGieOgthaHt35kPgbItMFeIc0/Ho7G0BLDg02BcIxWT mTMA==
X-Received: by 10.15.75.9 with SMTP id k9mr3717190eey.110.1397238369455; Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.100] (109107011157.gdansk.vectranet.pl. [109.107.11.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e42sm19176720eev.32.2014.04.11.10.46.07 for <dhcwg@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:46:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53482A5D.5050900@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:46:05 +0200
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AF08ACE@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AF08ACE@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20140411194605858
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/u92zQK5l45_DBq0rZTnCbbJsLdU
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-load-balancing-01: Passed
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 17:46:12 -0000

On 13.03.2014 03:36, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
> This WGLC is for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-load-balancing-01. Please send
> your comments by March 31, 2014. If you do not feel this document should
> advance, please state your reasons why.

Apologies for a bit of delay with wrapping this one out.

Chairs discussed this WGLC. Even though the number of responses was a
bit low, this second WLGC is on a draft that was very similar to the
previous WGLC that we had over a year ago. Furthermore, this is an
application of a well known and operationally proven algorithm to DHCPv6
and there was never any opposition for this work.

Hence we declare this WGLC to be successful. Some minor issues were
raised, so an updated revision is needed. Andre, please address them and
upload -02.

Thank you to everyone who responded to this WGLC.

Bernie & Tomek