Re: [dhcwg] Question on relay agent behavior in DHCPv6 prefix delegation
Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 04 February 2014 14:05 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0CF1A00E4 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 06:05:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6uP0fgay3rdf for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 06:05:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BB51A0135 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 06:05:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id s14E5h9w001968 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:05:43 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 829AD2029FE for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:06:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A75D2007F6 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:06:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is010446-4.intra.cea.fr [10.8.33.116]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id s14E5gVG022008 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 15:05:43 +0100
Message-ID: <52F0F3B6.4020505@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:05:42 +0100
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
References: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983181C095B@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAL10_BpTKHhfux8H7oYGuLYKEhZ5XQe7EokH_==2zCwBQFuPJw@mail.gmail.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983181C0A8C@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983181C0A8C@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Question on relay agent behavior in DHCPv6 prefix delegation
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 14:05:48 -0000
Le 03/02/2014 19:10, Templin, Fred L a écrit : > Hi Andre, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Andre Kostur [mailto:akostur@incognito.com] >> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 9:36 AM >> To: Templin, Fred L >> Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org WG >> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Question on relay agent behavior in DHCPv6 prefix delegation >> >> The RFC doesn't get into details since it may not even be the >> delegating router doing the route updates. As an example, in a cable >> network, it may be the CMTS (who plays the role of Relay Agent from >> DHCPv6's perspective) who is snooping the PD traffic and may emit the >> appropriate routing updates into the network (using some other >> standard dynamic routing protocol such as OSPF). > > Thanks for this. So, it seems that the RFC3633 DHCPv6 relays (and maybe > also servers) can snoop the PD exchanges and update the routing system > via some unspecified means. But, are there any more recent publications > that have either attempted or succeeded in specifying a standard method? Solutions (like 'snooping') to the problem have been explored in a number of documents at IETF and others. I with co-authors have attempted to formulate it as a problem in October 2014, and analyzed some solutions "Route Problem at Relay during DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation" draft-petrescu-relay-route-pd-problem-00.txt Alex > > Thanks - Fred > fred.l.templin@boeing.com > >> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Templin, Fred L >> <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote: >>> Hi, RFC3633 says: >>> >>> "14. Relay agent behavior >>> >>> A relay agent forwards messages containing Prefix Delegation options >>> in the same way as described in section 20, "Relay Agent Behavior" of >>> RFC 3315. >>> >>> If a delegating router communicates with a requesting router through >>> a relay agent, the delegating router may need a protocol or other >>> out-of-band communication to add routing information for delegated >>> prefixes into the provider edge router." >>> >>> My question is, since the publication of RFC3633 has there been a >>> new RFC published that specifies "a protocol or other out-of-band >>> communication to add routing information"? >>> >>> Thanks - Fred >>> fred.l.templin@boeing.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dhcwg mailing list >>> dhcwg@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg >> >> >> >> -- >> Andre Kostur > _______________________________________________ > dhcwg mailing list > dhcwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg > >
- [dhcwg] Question on relay agent behavior in DHCPv… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on relay agent behavior in D… Andre Kostur
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on relay agent behavior in D… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on relay agent behavior in D… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on relay agent behavior in D… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on relay agent behavior in D… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on relay agent behavior in D… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on relay agent behavior in D… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on relay agent behavior in D… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Question on relay agent behavior in D… Alexandru Petrescu