IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Agenda items for IETF75 dhcwg - First Call

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Thu, 14 May 2009 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEC93A6B41 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2009 18:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sbGiVcmAKlWE for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2009 18:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F4A3A69B5 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2009 18:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,192,1241395200"; d="scan'208";a="44159532"
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2009 01:35:21 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n4E1ZLRS030297; Wed, 13 May 2009 21:35:21 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4E1ZLQT023698; Thu, 14 May 2009 01:35:21 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.15]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 13 May 2009 21:35:21 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 21:35:20 -0400
Message-ID: <8E296595B6471A4689555D5D725EBB210CBABEA7@xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C630DCE2.A5FF2%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Agenda items for IETF75 dhcwg - First Call
Thread-Index: AcnUKkgX8FLowQubmEKQyBE6LZ6cggABy+Yg
References: <C630DCE2.A5FF2%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: John Jason Brzozowski <john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 May 2009 01:35:21.0915 (UTC) FILETIME=[3F1EF0B0:01C9D434]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1479; t=1242264921; x=1243128921; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=volz@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Bernie=20Volz=20(volz)=22=20<volz@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[dhcwg]=20Agenda=20items=20for=20IETF75 =20dhcwg=20-=20First=20Call |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22John=20Jason=20Brzozowski=22=20<john_brzozowski@c able.comcast.com>,=0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20<dhcwg@ietf.org >; bh=2tNiBPSR4LtB5Q5VLkEO52evRgik97RcV7a0Fz7LlBs=; b=oDXHb/r1Fz9lGzpHIT/gEpM8JtdbGCWyrZYAksgGy61cRalnMk8KaSfcAC HQo6vMj7weuZ+yGgunhUaRVyXVutHuOiq4Ph368VkvsBbfz/qdIcqFIBuCz9 Nb7D6sTOCZ;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=volz@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: dhc Chairs <dhc-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Agenda items for IETF75 dhcwg - First Call
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 01:33:51 -0000

What's up with some of the drafts that are supposed to be going to the
IETF/IESG?

For example, my two drafts are still in "I-D Exists"?

draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-bulk-leasequery-00 [draft]  2009-02-13 Active
I-D Exists  
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-vendor-message-00 [draft]  2009-01-12 Active
I-D Exists   

>From the IETF 74 slides:

- Ready for submission to IESG
draft-ietf-dhc-container-opt   [this one is at the IESG]
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-reconfigure-rebind   [still just I-D Exists]
draft-ietf-dhc-subnet-alloc  [still just I-D Exists]
draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option  [still just I-D Exists]
- In WG last call
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-vendor-message   [still just I-D Exists]
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-vendor-message   [still just I-D Exists]
draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption   [still just I-D Exists]
- Ready for WG last call
draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-bulk-leasequery   [no last call started]

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of John Jason Brzozowski
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 8:24 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Cc: dhc Chairs
Subject: [dhcwg] Agenda items for IETF75 dhcwg - First Call

This is the first call for agenda items for the IETF 75 dhcwg meeting in
Stockholm.  Please send your requests directly to the chairs.

Thanks,

Ted and John

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email