Re: [dhcwg] Adoption Call for draft-fkhp-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements

Hi Bernie,

Thanks for the reminder. I support its adoption (as a co-=author).

Thanks,
Ian

> On 8. Jan 2020, at 02:31, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi:
>  
> A reminder – we are looking for an indication of interest in adopting this work in the DHC WG, or whether anyone is opposed to it.
>  
> For the record (with WG chair hat OFF), I support adopting this work. I think this document would help vendors to supply better products and improve subscriber experience for networks in which prefix delegation is used.
>  
> Bernie
>  
> From: dhcwg <dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
> Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2019 11:03 AM
> To: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: [dhcwg] Adoption Call for draft-fkhp-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements - Respond by Jan 14, 2020
>  
> Hello:
>  
> As follow up from the IETF-106 DHC WG meeting, we are initiating the WG call for adoption onhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fkhp-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements/ <https://datatracker.ietf...org/doc/draft-fkhp-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements/> (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegating Relay). This document was presented at IETF-106 – seehttps://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/slides-106-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-delegating-relay-00 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/slides-106-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-delegating-relay-00>.
>  
> This starts the call for Adoption of this document. Please respond by January 14, 2020.
>  
> Thanks in advance for your consideration of whether the WG should or should not adopt this document as a work item.
>  
> And, Happy New Year!
>  
> Tomek & Bernie
>  
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

Re: [dhcwg] Adoption Call for draft-fkhp-dhc-dhcpv6-pd-relay-requirements - Respond by Jan 14, 2020