[dhcwg] New DHCPv6 Failover Protocol draft available
Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com> Thu, 24 December 2015 18:41 UTC
Return-Path: <kkinnear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E836C1ACD8D for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:41:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oMvih1nQeyzT for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:41:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CBB51ACD88 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 10:41:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1045; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1450982468; x=1452192068; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: cc:to:mime-version; bh=Wi+6L/z/4a3REBWsWflLfN2DXiI3OFD47/lEaOS4RBc=; b=Vc/Xl9vhjp4qPlkicoZpXZZC2ze/GcVsnv3rPFBpQrVucolEfBRWW2gX YPrWeLwRFMuoLNyXwsX8f3HkXe4L9rCt65VxRGEKVVWigkjLlcw39RnQk IcQvFIFkNhCtBW9lATwvAlomvPM6Nz6xF8eJC7SIVVGeWhUAP+ycvcxWi c=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,474,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="220578638"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Dec 2015 18:41:08 +0000
Received: from bxb-kkinnear-88111.cisco.com (bxb-kkinnear-88111.cisco.com [10.98.10.252]) (authenticated bits=0) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tBOIf6kW017521 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Dec 2015 18:41:07 GMT
From: Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:41:06 -0500
Message-Id: <6E528BC2-C896-42DE-AF9E-7A533332900A@cisco.com>
To: "<dhcwg@ietf.org>" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
X-Authenticated-User: kkinnear
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/x-7RBRGrRpbssH8K2lVR65gTpqw>
Cc: Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Subject: [dhcwg] New DHCPv6 Failover Protocol draft available
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 18:41:10 -0000
Folks, I have uploaded a new revision of the DHCPv6 Failover draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-01 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-01> This revision includes many changes from the two detailed technical reviews obtained thus far from Shawn Routhier and Bernie Volz. Too many changes to actually list here, as it happens, but as both reviews were posted to this list if you want to see the discussion you can look back at those emails. I want to thank Shawn and Bernie again for the technical content of their reviews. Lots of folks can find the awkward wordings and unclear passages in a draft, and that's valuable for sure. But what this draft needed was people looking at it with and eye for "does this work?", and they both did that and help make it work, in addition to finding plenty of nits to fix. I don't think this draft is finished, but I can say that it a whole lot better than it was in the -00.txt draft. Regards -- Kim