Re: [dhcwg] IETF-100 (Singapore) Meeting Agenda Requests - due September 26, 2017

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <> Fri, 15 September 2017 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA71D134203 for <>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WfZXB0Tkp-On for <>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D9E1341FE for <>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=16223; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1505506890; x=1506716490; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=spvGjwuLelcqNGvGSfRLCAqJD54mPkJetg3QCutJziQ=; b=mRYzIxUSAQ2Xaxb/69G5dy1opnz1zG3/1ReNZHhHhkIhLJuqIl6KV+S6 o2IiaofhuouHx6AUo4gsmN3pakz2JUvgJOCslUHOboTbsu8Xcam5ZPxPY cyHb1++OC+AuHCObo9lk1kUX16NVSceUG1eHRLgJAkR5ljHByvlaK4qB/ A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,398,1500940800"; d="scan'208,217";a="295984105"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Sep 2017 20:21:29 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v8FKLTMd028828 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 20:21:29 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:21:28 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:21:28 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <>
To: "" <>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] IETF-100 (Singapore) Meeting Agenda Requests - due September 26, 2017
Thread-Index: AdMVNRhg+zy1AxhuSMSTGepUHpDy/QNMpYTwAv2k48A=
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 20:21:28 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_69fc598f8aa6460c82be7e53852b9c42XCHALN003ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IETF-100 (Singapore) Meeting Agenda Requests - due September 26, 2017
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 20:21:32 -0000


Just another reminder for agenda items.

There's not a lot on the agenda and so we will likely only request 60 minute session. One topic will be future of the WG / re-chartering (more at

We have had a couple of WG documents expire and not republished (so far) - draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt (there was an update pending from Ian) and draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-forcerenew-extensions (this was awaiting further comments from one or more of the authors before proceeding). And, then there was draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6 which I think the WG has for now abandoned (at least for now). And the plan for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate-05 is to let it expire (unless seDHCPv6 rekindles).

So our current WG document queue is rather small with 3 documents:

draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-lwm2m-bootstrap-options-00 -- On agenda.
draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-06  -- Submitted to IESG for Publication: Proposed Standard.
draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-10 -- Hopefully soon to be submitted to IESG.

Once 3315bis is done, we'll want to eventually advance to full standard (that will require some time to elapse).

-          Bernie

From: dhcwg [] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IETF-100 (Singapore) Meeting Agenda Requests - due September 26, 2017


Just a friendly reminder to send agenda requests.

You can visit to see what is presently on the agenda.

-          Bernie

From: dhcwg [] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 3:40 PM
Subject: [dhcwg] IETF-100 (Singapore) Meeting Agenda Requests - due September 26, 2017


If you have any interest in presenting to the DHC wg during IETF-100, please submit a request by Tuesday, September 26th. Tomek & I must submit a request for a session by the September 29th deadline (see

As in the past, please provide (to at least the chairs - email<>):

Title Of Session:
Related Drafts:
Time Required:
Purpose of Session:

We do want to remind those requesting time that you should focus on discussing key issues that need resolution to move a draft forward or to introduce potential new work.

While we are still about 3 months from the meeting, the session requests have opened up and we need to know approximately how much time to request.

- Bernie & Tomek