Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: Kernel implementation of DANIR for IoT Router - DHCPv6-PD and ND

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Hi Li,

 From your message, I think I understand some things, but I am not sure.
The reason of doubt is that the English expression is not clear.

I suppose that you are using an automatic translator, from Chinese to
English, whose output is not good for me.

I suggest a better way: please write the Chinese text that you type,
instead of the translation.

I will then convert it myself with my preferred converter, which is
translate.google.fr.

In this way, we may communicate better, and concentrate on the technical
aspects.

Alex

你好，

从你的消息，我想我理解一些事情，但我不确定。
怀疑的原因是英语表达不清楚。

我想你使用的是自动翻译器，从中文到
英语，输出不好。

我建议一个更好的方法：请写下你输入的中文文本，
而不是翻译。

然后我将使用我喜欢的转换器自行转换它
translate.google.fr。

通过这种方式，我们可以更好地沟通，并专注于技术
方面。

亚历克斯

Le 20/09/2019 à 01:55, Li HUANG a écrit :
> 08:47.hk <http://47.hk> S8 Sept 20 2019
> 
> 
> continued...,
> 
> 
> Thank you rephrasing our diagonose for assuring the points.
> 
> 
> Wireless advance for dhcpv6 is imagined to experienced network maps.
>  Which none wireless devices and plan isp at all decades.
> 
> 
> Microsoft who is handing rcf3315 according modified failures,  to 
> changed board OEM machine, has reached wall to resolve it inside
> microsoft.
> 
> 
> Looking for some where who would enter the juridical like
> IEFT...etc., in order to edge out what responsibility taken by who,
> if in such compromising rcf rules obeying  in conditions.
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely yours Li HUANG
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019, 21:05 Alexandre Petrescu 
> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
> wrote:
> 
> Dear Li,
> 
> Thank you for the partial clarification you sent in private about
> 'apt windows'.  I understand that by 'apt windows' you mean 'apart
> from windows', which means 'with the exception of Windows'.
> 
> So, I think you mean that we in our draft have a preference to run 
> DHCPv6-PD over the wireless interface, like with a phone.  You also 
> mean that is ok.  You also mean that only Windows runs DHCPv6 on a
> wired interface; because Windows blocked DHCPv6 on wwan and wlan
> interface.
> 
> I think you are saying that this Windows blocking DHCPv6-PD on the 
> wireless interfaces caused you a lot of trouble, even after system 
> updates.
> 
> Because of that I think you are asking that we make and forward to 
> Microsoft, a request to make DHCPv6-PD on the wireless interface.
> 
> I may be wrong though.
> 
> I would like to ask you: do you know somebody at Microsoft who cares 
> about DHCPv6?  Or should I write simply to [e-mail] 
> <mailto:[e-mail]> hoping they will direct the message
> to people in charge?
> 
> Alex
> 
> Le 18/09/2019 à 09:45, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit :
>> Dear Li,
>> 
>> Please help me understand:
>> 
>> What do you mean by 'apt windows'?
>> 
>> Alex
>> 
>> Le 18/09/2019 à 07:39, Li HUANG a écrit :
>>> 09:39.hk <http://39.hk> <http://39.hk/> S8 Sept 17th 2019
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you dhcwg returning on this,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> IoT either PTP to dhcpv6 pd server sounds very like the running 
>>> preferially to wireless, or phone networks instead of apt
> windows that
>>> blocked wwan, wlan services of it ...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> To the kernel apart, OEM user would principle following its
>>> offered updates of system, in case dhcpv6 required update, how
>>> would
> clients
>>> obey protocol rcf 3315, 8415, 6260 whilst OEM warranty contract
> to get
>>> all none conflicts?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Microsoft is one putting on tracking, it must be forwarded to
> them about.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Let have your kind advises on it please .
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sincerely yours Li HUANG
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 10:48 Li HUANG <[e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 09:39.hk <http://39.hk> <http://39.hk> S8 Sept 17th 2019
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you dhcwg returning on this,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> IoT either PTP to dhcpv6 pd server sounds very like the running 
>>> preferially to wireless, or phone networks instead of apt
> windows
>>> that blocked wwan, wlan services of it ...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> To the kernel apart, OEM user would principle following its
> offered
>>> updates of system, in case dhcpv6 required update, how would
> clients
>>> obey protocol rcf 3315, 8415, 6260 whilst OEM warranty
> contract to
>>> get all none conflicts?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Microsoft is one putting on tracking, it must be forwarded
> to them
>>> about.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Let have your kind advises on it please .
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sincerely yours Li HUANG
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019, 00:18 Alexandre Petrescu 
>>> <[e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]> 
> <mailto:[e-mail] 
> <mailto:[e-mail]>>>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello to participants in DHC WG,
>>> 
>>> One might be interested in this kernel implementation of 
>>> DHCPv6-PD parts.
>>> 
>>> Yours,
>>> 
>>> Alex and Dmytro
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -------- Message transféré -------- Sujet :     Kernel
>>> implementation of DANIR for IoT Router - DHCPv6-PD and ND Date :
>>> Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:21:46 +0200 De :     Alexandre Petrescu
> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>> <mailto:[e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>> Pour : [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
> <mailto:[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> <mailto:[e-mail]
>>> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> The kernel implementation of DANIR for IoT Router was
> finally
>>> working a few weeks ago.
>>> 
>>> It is an implementation of draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir-03.txt. This
>>> is the right thing to do, instead of '64share' RFC7278.
>>> 
>>> In this video one can see the kernel in the IoT Router
> issues a
>>> DHCPv6 PD request on its egress and obtains a /56; it
> then makes
>>> several /64s out of it and subsequently sends RAs with
> these on
>>> the ingress interfaces.
>>> 
>>> The DHCPv6 server is took off-the-shelf.  The PDP part
> is not
>>> present in the IoT Router, but we expect it to work ok
> on a ptp
>>> link on a cellular network to a smartphone.
>>> 
>>> The video recorded the virtual machines output on the
> IoT Router
>>> (featured below), the Client device behind it, and the
> DHCPv6-PD
>>> server.
>>> 
>>> https://youtu.be/DymVQY7bCUM
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Yours,
>>> 
>>> Alexandre PETRESCU and Dmytro SHYTYI
>>> 
>>> PS: we will soon post the source code on github.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing
>>> list [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>> <mailto:[e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list 
>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 
> _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list 
> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>