[dhcwg] vendor-specific relay suboption draft
Mark Stapp <mjs@cisco.com> Wed, 04 February 2004 17:30 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA16105 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:30:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoQqz-0005IO-2u for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:30:21 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i14HULtK020352 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:30:21 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoQqy-0005IB-TP for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:30:20 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA16022 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:30:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoQqx-0005cE-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:30:19 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AoQpy-0005RX-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:29:19 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoQp0-0005HR-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:28:18 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoQom-0004kO-8K; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:28:04 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoQoI-0004fh-Ny for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:27:34 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA15754 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:27:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoQoH-0005AE-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:27:33 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AoQnL-000521-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:26:36 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoQmm-0004tV-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:26:00 -0500
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (64.102.124.12) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2004 09:25:36 -0800
Received: from flask.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@flask.cisco.com [161.44.122.62]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i14HPRXi014099 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:25:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mjs-xp.cisco.com (dhcp-10-86-160-215.cisco.com [10.86.160.215]) by flask.cisco.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.6-GR) with ESMTP id AFU71314; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:25:26 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20040204121546.01bf6130@goblet.cisco.com>
X-Sender: mjs@goblet.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 12:24:57 -0500
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
From: Mark Stapp <mjs@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: [dhcwg] vendor-specific relay suboption draft
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Vendor-specific capabilities seem to me to be a useful addition to the relay information data, so I've published (as an individual submission) a draft defining a vendor-specific relay suboption. I liked and have re-used the self-identifying method that Josh used in his vendor-identifying vendor-specific option drafts. I'd like to ask the WG to consider adopting this draft as a WG item. Here's a link to the initial version; please take a look and offer feedback. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-stapp-dhc-vendor-suboption-00.txt Thanks, Mark _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg