IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] 'draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host'

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Fri, 25 August 2017 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE04132144 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 06:04:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ce8e3m0fIIus for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 06:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x233.google.com (mail-yw0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C964132027 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 06:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x233.google.com with SMTP id x21so12544358ywg.2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 06:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=J3giAnXddNS10NlDCsNgSeOEK6j1Yg6ignKoryPuh4k=; b=jQUWpsSHmTCEFO9t0R3gqVZ7UR6zgvbt6HeJN8M3yeMkoNIfs0aVChFvd1y1Zs9kq9 WW7LmUKLTBJ+MGSEXt6/zNCvT+lbLVePO0yAcuWm6ALxq/U5B+P/DQkwtteIFnKvZVDI D9fblMUlrjJUCR1mUBEEfL/M+95MXo4zsQeAxgToQ9oTJGeU8b4fzglGkI4v4ddkD9uM j0bMYUtTJNUnLGuIgaO3OBDGGUwfair5CejH/dpimNWAQyYqJjvMFXvhwX3DW3pWkfYq nSzyGF80Dr18fOwLT8990DLBKLqM9DbSQJJIDYcqnv13SuzBVVSkM8FrM0w3bOtCyDu5 E1sQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=J3giAnXddNS10NlDCsNgSeOEK6j1Yg6ignKoryPuh4k=; b=dKQ+2zL85j+E+jvtfWhxi25bs4pJBvuTWPkvvgxzQbjCO0IsEiQicBm1L19r1NYrcO pWDc+ZRmOdznMcyAfVuKVJBo4tkUwNtxyxBib00NRYdNknmu2T2DMjd3lpJW+oDEvS1g 0r4au0kFZynhMutqqOgZUaYqXcxld7LMfiEJbHwsgWut/NAljpNaXEOGByPJgw7x9Exz NqjFTwjVt+WsMZhLON4x5NxRWm/FyOW6ViQH60S9IuqfeyI5AXVCVe8WJnrzMIIBxA3P PPTyAveAkiNkJcIwxsijRKKik8FRqD67KfmvzdQs1Av7SmXILeZEKPVpgsRUuyu0wqtt OXlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5jb2V6rvcQfmehh6EPDeM1diDAjNVBHFxfZxi6hb2fsyIb59MuT M6rIQWGzpMfHSw==
X-Received: by 10.37.96.214 with SMTP id u205mr8885318ybb.38.1503666278070; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 06:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.5] (45-19-110-76.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net. [45.19.110.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t12sm2393387ywe.106.2017.08.25.06.04.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 06:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <61580826-0121-444E-8C15-05AE29D4D6B6@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4B501FF3-75DA-43E2-9FA6-C1E030BF8A65"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:04:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <516c3b6d5f0a466793ba8b2927860787@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
References: <516c3b6d5f0a466793ba8b2927860787@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/yUDOR5W7AIg1cqQNHACVoPMFiAA>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] 'draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host'
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:04:46 -0000

Hi Fred,

> On Aug 24, 2017, at 1:42 PM, Templin, Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:
> 
> Have people in this community seen the following document that is working
> its way through the publication process in the 'v6ops' working group:
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-07.txt
> 
> It seems to make some very limiting statements about DHCPv6 in a similar
> spirit as was done in RFC7934 (the limiting statements apply to both IA_NA
> and IA_PD).

There are a couple of references to DHCPv6 in the draft. I do not see any limitation to the use of IA_PD.

There is a recommendation against a IA_NA *only* network that is a straight reference to RFC7934 and nothing additional

"an IA_NA-only network is not recommended per RFC7934 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7934> [RFC7934] section 8 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7934#section-8>"

I have asked for the motivation for the text (See my ballot at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host/ballot/#suresh-krishnan <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host/ballot/#suresh-krishnan>)

"however it SHOULD NOT use stateful DHCPv6 to receive a service provider managed IPv6 address”

Is there some specific text you are concerned about?

Thanks
Suresh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email