Re: usage of rebind for PD (Re: [dhcwg] WG last call on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-prefix-delegation-02.txt)

I guess the next rev of the draft should change the text to indicate the 
use of NotOnLink.

- Ralph

At 05:19 PM 3/12/2003 +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / 
=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 08 Mar 2003 23:16:31 +0000,
> >>>>> Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com> said:
>
>[snip]
> >> It would also be helpful to describe how the requesting should react
> >> to this event.
>
> > requesting router should go to Solicit state. I think this will be
> > made clearer in modified base spec/new PD revision where we'll use
> > NotOnLink rather than lifetimes = 0.
>
>Hmm, opt-prefix-delegation-03 still says:
>
>    Rebind message      If the delegating router cannot find a binding
>(...)
>                        the delegating router MAY
>                        send a Reply message to the requesting router
>                        containing the IA_PD with the lifetimes of the
>                        prefixes in the IA_PD set to zero.
>
>or are you talking about a change in a future revision?
>
>                                         JINMEI, Tatuya
>                                         Communication Platform Lab.
>                                         Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
>                                         jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg