[Diem] Weekly github digest (DIEM WG GitHub Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 12 July 2026 09:34 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: diem@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: diem@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4523511556560 for <diem@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2026 02:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1783848841; bh=87BGR2GXFBjZZsnnQWH5Uo6IB05k/18Au+qfiPqptGA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=PkvAdni5wvB9RX9L+iV5udyVHdjtl8t+KxqPqBZxfxLZkhelBpc/xYKqtBpxJ/UAM 6DoYF8TZTSAyy11+EUMSj6UDAt4V4TiEyCBlPr+y5ke80sB7z1kbatwIyKxyFmzgPZ xYOyRDy3bqzshNK2uiJ8UO+qaUeXlIuoxhW7eSqo=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="d2/V5f4F"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="mu2lguNK"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EK1cEEofQ8cg for <diem@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2026 02:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fhigh-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.156]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BC8D11554DD9 for <diem@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2026 02:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BBB1400067 for <diem@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2026 05:31:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 12 Jul 2026 05:31:35 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1783848695; x=1783935095; bh=iUx5NJt3/mN4MfK6skIqgXYGKhSEY6yeUIK 26X5LEJI=; b=d2/V5f4FiecHKOOg55xuOTgvVfznvRAIigNHUmXPN2/X2QhGEKn UdXHxDDKviOm6mY8zorfH5VUL4ZY6SFg2NpIZo2g5Sw0UllWhd0Uamy081mtKabU 61YCCFZ9aKZJr+WnokjA9ihICxQnNwLnp2k1hmEiSatyb9DkeakfrWE8p6LEA7hd fAIczlR3sdSLioiZmS+npz4yyG+Loc48miXn0MWujvn1PqkTMA0DuM4GLu1Pn9G8 UIv+2jIBFC9aSVRFrcdQWTWa4IcTNVtlv/xfszTMsA/lek197okUdCDNe/lHVqmp wdZI6JVqzL8VcvrYHKFzTPMj3/yZI+Jujhg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1783848695; x= 1783935095; bh=iUx5NJt3/mN4MfK6skIqgXYGKhSEY6yeUIK26X5LEJI=; b=m u2lguNK7DpbPwFC84Ohv+2zjgvMsxLtS+W4uozYyFp33wjYZpm4rC33CSybbo8HY ws5bpE63xbV5L9F4Vj0Kw2MNhZR+no50NHmqP0/pN++yq5zr5+iAUZkf1WsOoBlc qvvOjXx1UnFGd4tKrg1rC4LH0Q0VocOJOqNmROiEn1YD85UEL4P5cWqckY61eGhy HFZOPh92vlYZTFK7Bifo5BV7iAVd1Rc2gwO6mbULGgy0lZQgeqSXV5sWLZzmR8vk 77Md7EmfqG/cD/NF6R22y99yEAdsoLPcS/fDDBVusdDz0cmvCEh2+RBABSPtei3w XBNqGrn3IeJStCqsylEuA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:915TakZKGGkvooJczWrZXgGLbc372wU-3xh6es4a0bt5kHSt_yfH_w> <xme:915TalQVODH9L5jA0u_QZO6doSzQHwLmtjvsLlCpVUW17yNx1Cf3NUcIB1uDZsSMg b4GEAed3zvBtmWjOMaDdHoGGTRINXgnZV37CQ7hDYBIA8QJu9hnAw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:915TaqBZK-KAISX-L35b1DrI-LOVnVYfG52Ka3mHd2M_tp5HFLeCds_IcN_F88Rwp9r6AoOPviuiAgSaY8_qKh_CWuPLdpKEA-f3azt8LXKgfwaCqjrVYZmorYjoOExpQlu8MQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: dmFkZTEyimhxe8NEPn7W8C0H7icJigY7XkCm/slny5yspRWHE46LkXqaswccGk1P5uTj2W hddINVDRphGb1uXWNVCo0hk/jB34u3EqBUU9DD9NTubL4/A5HQRt7palcxrsC0j9dnLN8P YWnV6vHqygmWeZo0QD7AlwZnhIPYhJ8Qbvbv3dGwPkyhqNzwVgsgKX6N/SM4f2mVL0Ltxm sp9XRRCWpRmUnguBce2aRdx2fRERQdD/ELrDMCijHGnjxHE64hY5l12Rk3fjnneHY+2EoS Bs6Qoud+rnOXufQin5fwhNICr3n2NbYhJe7oEQQzbMQLP/mjNZzCc4B2QN+EfFAP3KrOQY LssO8fN0p0HtLYu6r8Mm1Ys6mncrh9VBIz/mj7AgdJaRj0tA3sybM95xsSyDeQPEqrffUB mVjj+xu1ToSVIXwMBodu0Nft0wl0y4tzzqFLijzrf+O0CFwt4nN3ZOrQ32UQBIk+tiRzaT 66gq2+X9oWxnvFp3AAEuSwrNkCtNH7jOolx2Nfp02jOK+q7MnG8Vau76LVAUPjMLAJZ4rh trDcO6mD+4tRT8Etz2nS/XlLkKNef2s6L1s4S5SA64ARv9AuLB630r6yb0WCOWSoGrhfJS e707N3WT/6dWtPHGkNnjXDdvoAC4s3Zr4JB2Tz2myIVZev5p1Fq76VQgsLgQ
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:915Tarf9GkXGG3RSrJOnURzlMCUBC0FU_BlKvsazFKdAZN6wh8Ebfg> <xmx:915TajPcRr8eUF5hprG5T17gLRjdnGkwNTyOB_TOjjS8TW_MQHYE6Q> <xmx:915Tat4Ue7zrufKygGNLOI66I77Ut3WEtM-2s2LsgwjtqK4CqSv3Ig> <xmx:915TavJL9DZlc-uGCdiSDKv1RH1NkgLJSglXU-8p9iqw2CUHwnW0zA> <xmx:915TamBdoTqI1gkAei146tfYEIHNBpcxXlHloJp9oZa8X-VAzgQTIKOS>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Message-Id: <1783848695.2881571.27D54185@outbound.messagingengine.com>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <diem@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jul 2026 05:31:35 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============4474750800038743218=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: diem@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2026 02:31:35 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: C7GUOQL4NW5WWFUI4DXGV24MHMEYWILD
X-Message-ID-Hash: C7GUOQL4NW5WWFUI4DXGV24MHMEYWILD
X-MailFrom: do_not_reply@mnot.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Diem] Weekly github digest (DIEM WG GitHub Activity Summary)
List-Id: Discussion of digital emblems <diem.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/diem/Jyi9xz-cPIivS8AWww3w53jLFOk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/diem>
List-Help: <mailto:diem-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:diem-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:diem@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:diem-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:diem-leave@ietf.org>
Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements (+0/-9/💬13)
10 issues received 13 new comments:
- #36 Any requirements for post-DNS discovery mechanisms? (4 by felixlinker, rohanmahy)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/36
- #30 Additional potential emblems: Any missing requirements? (1 by felixlinker)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/30
- #26 Should whether an emblem supports or mandates forensic tracing be an extension or core consideration? (1 by felixlinker)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/26
- #24 Should we add CITES as a digital emblem use case? (1 by felixlinker)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/24
- #23 How should this draft expand on the Press case? (1 by felixlinker)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/23 [needs-text]
- #18 ISO shipping containers and related systems (1 by felixlinker)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/18 [needs-text]
- #17 Diplomatic bag rules (1 by felixlinker)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/17 [has-PR] [needs-text]
- #14 Attacker and authorizing party roles and operations in use cases (1 by felixlinker)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/14 [has-PR]
- #13 Is there a need for forensic records of emblems for some emblem types? (1 by felixlinker)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/13 [has-PR] [needs-author-discussion]
- #2 Add outline of Security Considerations Topics/sub-sections (1 by felixlinker)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/2 [has-PR] [in-progress]
9 issues closed:
- Any requirements for post-DNS discovery mechanisms? https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/36
- Should we add CITES as a digital emblem use case? https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/24
- ISO shipping containers and related systems https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/18 [needs-text]
- Attacker and authorizing party roles and operations in use cases https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/14 [has-PR]
- How should this draft expand on the Press case? https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/23 [needs-text]
- Additional potential emblems: Any missing requirements? https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/30
- Diplomatic bag rules https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/17 [has-PR] [needs-text]
- Is there a need for forensic records of emblems for some emblem types? https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/13 [has-PR] [needs-author-discussion]
- Add outline of Security Considerations Topics/sub-sections https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements/issues/2 [has-PR] [in-progress]
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-diem/diem-requirements
--
To have a summary like this sent to your list, see: https://github.com/ietf-github-services/activity-summary
- [Diem] Weekly github digest (DIEM WG GitHub Activ… Repository Activity Summary Bot