[Diffserv-interest] Re: streaming/QoS
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 09 April 2002 06:57 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA27865 for <diffserv-interest-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 02:57:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id CAA24570 for diffserv-interest-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 02:57:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA24027; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 02:48:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA21162 for <diffserv-interest@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 19:12:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.163.11]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA09468 for <diffserv-interest@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 19:11:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from FRED-W2K6.cisco.com ([10.25.10.242]) by sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g38NBRq7025651 for <diffserv-interest@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 16:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020408161027.01df6a90@mira-sjcm-4.cisco.com>
X-Sender: fred@mira-sjcm-4.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 16:11:18 -0700
To: diffserv-interest@ietf.org
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A29143A40AEAE3459FF829D1DD4331613C2427@KC-MAIL2.kc.umkc.ed u>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: [Diffserv-interest] Re: streaming/QoS
Sender: diffserv-interest-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: diffserv-interest-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Differentiated services general discussion <diffserv-interest.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: diffserv-interest@ietf.org
At 03:26 PM 4/8/2002, Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student) wrote: >Hi all, > I have some queries relating to mapping audio& video applications and > QoS . >1.Of all the existing applications,video and audio streaming demands more >QoS mechanisms. >Is their is any study relating these streaming applications with diffserv. > >2.This question is more or less related to the first.Please refer to some >research work which discusses relation between Audio& video qulaity and >network >performance.Some thoughts about this topic is also appreciated. > >3.Is expedited forwarding only way to give guaranteed treatment to >audio/video >streaming applications > >4.E-model of ITU-T estimates MOS by mapping voice quality with impairments >like delay, >signaling and user expection.Can we related these impairments with >diffserv drop precedence >for mapping streaming application with QoS. > >Thanks in advance , >Senthil _______________________________________________ Diffserv-interest mailing list Diffserv-interest@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv-interest
- [Diffserv-interest] RE: streaming/QoS Ayyasamy, Senthilkumar (UMKC-Student)
- [Diffserv-interest] Re: streaming/QoS Fred Baker
- Re: [Diffserv-interest] RE: streaming/QoS danny.de_vleeschauwer