Re: [Dime] explicit routing and NAI considered for rechartering
Tina TSOU <tena@huawei.com> Wed, 30 July 2008 08:03 UTC
Return-Path: <dime-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dime-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dime-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329B928C118; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A94728C118 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.494, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jcb4U-ewpVQg for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.65]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81C928C111 for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in [172.24.2.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0K4T00II67PWM7@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for dime@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:03:33 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.24]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0K4T005SC7PWZ9@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for dime@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:03:32 +0800 (CST)
Received: from z24109b ([10.70.39.116]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K4T0046V7PW0Q@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for dime@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:03:32 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:03:32 +0800
From: Tina TSOU <tena@huawei.com>
To: dime@ietf.org, "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
Message-id: <029701c8f21a$c2583010$7427460a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <007a01c8ec61$da366580$7427460a@china.huawei.com> <C41BFCED3C088E40A8510B57B165C1623E27FD@FIESEXC007.nsn-intra.net>
Subject: Re: [Dime] explicit routing and NAI considered for rechartering
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2024392903=="
Sender: dime-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dime-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Hannes et al,
We resubmitted it.
Since DIME WG has considered draft-korhonen-dime-nai-routing for rechartering, will our extended routing draft be considered also?
A new version of I-D, draft-tsou-dime-base-routing-ext-04.txt has been successfuly submitted.
Filename: draft-tsou-dime-base-routing-ext
Revision: 04
Title: Diameter Routing Extensions
Creation_date: 2008-07-29
WG ID: Independent Submission
Number_of_pages: 28
Abstract:
This document describes two(2) extensions to the current diameter
routing scheme. The first extension describes an explicit routing
mechanism that MAY be employed by Diameter nodes to allow specific
stateful Diameter proxies to remain in the path of all messages
exchanges constituting a Diameter session. The second extension
describes a realm based redirection scheme as an alternative to host
based redirection described in [RFC3588].
B. R.
Tina
----- Original Message -----
From: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
To: ext Tina TSOU ; dime@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 3:09 PM
Subject: RE: [Dime] explicit routing and NAI considered for rechartering
Hi Tina,
I guess you are talking about this document when you speak about
explicit routing document:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tsou-dime-base-routing-ext-03
It is expired. Why didn't you submit it for the meeting?
Ciao
Hannes
________________________________
From: dime-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of ext Tina TSOU
Sent: 23 July, 2008 04:17
To: dime@ietf.org
Subject: [Dime] explicit routing and NAI considered for
rechartering
Hi All,
Could explicit routing draft be considered together with Jouni's
NAI draft?
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08jul/agenda/dime.txt
B. R.
Tina
_______________________________________________ DiME mailing list DiME@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
- [Dime] explicit routing and NAI considered for re… Tina TSOU
- Re: [Dime] explicit routing and NAI considered fo… Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Dime] explicit routing and NAI considered fo… Tina TSOU