Re: [Dime] draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter open issues

"Glen Zorn" <gwz@net-zen.net> Wed, 24 November 2010 04:00 UTC

Return-Path: <gwz@net-zen.net>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2A628C100 for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:00:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Ud1iwH8Q9or for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:00:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpauth02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.182]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 29F1628C0EE for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:00:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 26565 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2010 04:01:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (110.168.99.145) by smtpauth02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.182) with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2010 04:01:28 -0000
From: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>
To: 'Sebastien Decugis' <sdecugis@nict.go.jp>
References: <AAE76B481E7A0E4C96610790A852B9A62508045DC7@USNAVSXCHMBSA3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com> <4CEC6DD4.2060507@nict.go.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4CEC6DD4.2060507@nict.go.jp>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:01:20 +0700
Organization: Network Zen
Message-ID: <000001cb8b8c$42fab500$c8f01f00$@net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcuLeRr4/PVAiilAShicfBal8ZIANgAEvdaw
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter open issues
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 04:00:32 -0000

Sebastien Decugis [mailto://sdecugis@nict.go.jp] writes:

> Hello,
> 
> I think the solution to issue 1 is reasonable.
> 
> About issue 2, is there a reason why you are not considering a "solution
> 5" that was proposed during Beijing meeting, 

Good question!

> as follow:
> 
> Solution 5: Use Key-SPI AVP defined in draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran for
> the request. Use Key AVP in the answer. (you'll have to precise which
> AVPs must be present in this grouped AVP in the answer in you
> application, like for example Key-SPI AVP).
> 

...

Love is never safe.  It is fierce and unpredictable and impossible to
domesticate.  You can't make it your slave because it is simply bigger than
you.
 ~ Susan Piver