[Dime] Agent overload
Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> Fri, 21 February 2014 16:01 UTC
Return-Path: <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1414C1A0279 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:01:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.58
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Ps_CfpUeeuX for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:01:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from biz131.inmotionhosting.com (biz131.inmotionhosting.com [173.247.247.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1FFB1A03C8 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:01:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpe-76-187-100-94.tx.res.rr.com ([76.187.100.94]:54957 helo=SDmac.local) by biz131.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>) id 1WGsXB-0002fj-7L for dime@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:01:06 -0800
Message-ID: <53077841.9010003@usdonovans.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:01:05 -0600
From: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070605050509060101020208"
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz131.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - usdonovans.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz131.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: srdonovan@usdonovans.com
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/62VQR117IfvYQ7YPzS_hoivpkRo
Subject: [Dime] Agent overload
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:01:12 -0000
At the Vancouver IETF meeting I believe there was consensus that Agent overload needs to be addressed by the DIME working group. The group wasn't ready to make a decision as to whether it should be done as a separate document or if it should be incorporated into the base DOIC specification. I would like to request guidance from the working group on these two options. My preference is to incorporate agent overload into the base DOIC specification. If that is not done then I propose we make the agent overload draft a working group item. Regards, Steve
- [Dime] Agent overload Steve Donovan