[Dime] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling-13: (with COMMENT)

[Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-group-signaling/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Barry's editorial suggestions.

What does the "*)" in the table in Section 3.3 mean?

>From Section 10:

   [...]  if the Diameter client or server is
   compromised, an attacker could launch DoS attacks by terminating a
   large number of sessions with a limited set of commands using the
   session group management concept.

Is it worth mentioning that an attacker could also mess with the set of
sessions associated with a group, possibly causing disruptions other than bulk
session terminations?