[Dime] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning-04: (with COMMENT)
"Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 05 August 2015 21:17 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7EF1AC3C6; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 14:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BtzP5Z-Js6BO; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 14:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661391AC3A6; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 14:17:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.3.0.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150805211750.17217.6618.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 14:17:50 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/79NWc_zhdMV8g1wGoTzmbuhFLbQ>
Cc: draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning@ietf.org, dime-chairs@ietf.org, tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk, dime@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning.shepherd@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning.ad@ietf.org
Subject: [Dime] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 21:17:51 -0000
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dime-4over6-provisioning/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- As reported by Tim Chown in his OPS DIR review: Overall, I believe the document is Ready. Despite its nature (as a list of definitions) it generally reads very well. There are some minor typos, and items to be checked, as listed below, some of which would no doubt be picked up by the RFC Editor: 1. Section 2.1 line 4, should be “provisions” (plural). 2. Section 2.5, line 5 of second bullet point, “IPv4” not “Pv4”. 3. Section 3.3.2. I found the third paragraph a little clumsy to read; perhaps clarify the SSM prefix of ff3x::/32 in effect being a /96?. Also, do you mean bits 33-95 here, or bits 32-95 (twice)? 4. Section 3.5, Figure 5. Should the vertical lines be below 8 and 16, rather than below 7 and 15? 5. Section 6 reads a little strangely, in that it says in 6.1 “hey, you can mitm Diameter”, then 6.2 says “you MUST use TLS/IPsec avoiding intermediate nodes”. Seems a little conflicting in outlook? 6. Two transition drafts cited in the text are now published as RFC 7596 and RFC 7597.
- [Dime] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf… Benoit Claise