[Dime] status of draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-04

"jouni.nospam" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Mon, 12 December 2016 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E653129D2B for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 08:58:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hQrdvm5VbLoY for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 08:58:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x241.google.com (mail-pg0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E1B2129D09 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 08:57:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x241.google.com with SMTP id 3so1501582pgd.0 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 08:57:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=JAwXhOf1aQC4AlfhpYz5IyHnZaJ8af5CAowSiF4a/pI=; b=EiDjcb+vccL1SBwL6EbDiSE/KQN5wGMsOjneiLRCEF7R1yiTZdH5529xGa/rhmSkq2 MTyeaDvb25FYnzMz6+LrSNZbM6ZrWYX2C4/m5KPEeN3IfQaswGl7dWVsPUA9iQBOcJjv 3am1dMin25uYKWvgG8cP4NZ/bJWZtfjNeWVCOK5+pALQ00CUohXgX6jMFAnLoDKOsEu/ ZyPacdJPL1qnWv+FqWMZ8QKNtfBaQjfOpfJ4lbCN8n/QhsbcO9//9sLc9zFd9ynrIUtJ //l239vVeVeKYDRjPh+pGiAdPDW8OCuZBqBK02qdzS5XcehAXHdM0GA89R0IetIe+atN flOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=JAwXhOf1aQC4AlfhpYz5IyHnZaJ8af5CAowSiF4a/pI=; b=Jkk0yFbQcKDlHgLAzwerMSE1O2yxflECqEUa/8CCMvxqLxMduE6GBIQcoLyeoHRn9+ bd2EwDK/ISx5/q553Fj+7nhwNkaiJ5/BDmDNy/onUCKT9HTb46er7FU5esZq+g46IyPv b3WPyqbBTIa7HyAsXjZ5V8FUHL5yp1af3lTRf5iJ3bnsRCfTi3GWIRudPyW3mWXyMwLn Fess9fuIj/fRAhlD1xZFY/E54TlnRYS5U5qTgzVMwPOjBSi/ZAw9KYk7uc8paSHUg8ec VHcABAvsuZ0mmB/UM71rMD9j3de53xNr+fvbf/2fgC3+TISLWUcVhf/rvTukEDNTtKgG xrnw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02VV0bXk+CZnLgR8hL6MIoUQ+XuZF7GKpObHkmm9aQdIoET17CUj9J2o4SBpJunDA==
X-Received: by 10.84.202.12 with SMTP id w12mr189219208pld.156.1481561834623; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 08:57:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcpw5-sj1-5.sj.broadcom.com ([216.31.219.19]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 13sm77020889pfz.30.2016.12.12.08.57.13 for <dime@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 08:57:13 -0800 (PST)
From: "jouni.nospam" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Message-Id: <BC6208A1-3FF0-4CE7-BADD-3C9ED5D8FA3D@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 08:57:12 -0800
To: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/9YvBCvafBxBdOROo3rXBfHEZYpw>
Subject: [Dime] status of draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control-04
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 16:58:25 -0000

Folks,

Out of the overload document family we got still one in the WG: draft-ietf-dime-doic-rate-control. There was already one WGLC for it but afair the number of reviews/responses was low. Note that draft-ietf-dime-agent-overload has a normative reference to this one, so if we intend to complete the set of remaining overload related documents they all need to be processed in parallel. 

I had a quick glance over the document and think it would deserve a quick WGLC just to make sure there are no issues since the last tweaks in the other related overload documents. I will send out another mail starting a one week WGLC and ending just before the Christmas.

Regards,
	Jouni