[Dime] FW: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4072 (1955)

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Mon, 07 December 2009 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7E13A67CF for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 05:49:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.416
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.416 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.183, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JwEHuw8g791c for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 05:49:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7123A67B1 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 05:49:13 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,355,1257138000"; d="scan'208";a="192995925"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2009 08:49:03 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.15]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2009 08:49:02 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:48:41 +0100
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401C70BA1@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4072 (1955)
Thread-Index: Acp0Hf1gJgY1nEs/Qv2DsXslX2TaxwDJdw0w
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: dime@ietf.org
Subject: [Dime] FW: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4072 (1955)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:49:14 -0000

 DIME WG,

Please advice concerning this errata. 

Thanks and Regards,

Dan


-----Original Message-----
From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] 
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 3:39 PM
To: pasi.eronen@nokia.com; tomhiller@lucent.com; gwz@cisco.com;
Romascanu, Dan (Dan); rbonica@juniper.net; Bernard_Aboba@hotmail.com;
david@mitton.com; john.loughney@nokia.com
Cc: gwz@net-zen.net; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4072 (1955)


The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4072, "Diameter
Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Application".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4072&eid=1955

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Glen Zorn <gwz@net-zen.net>

Section: 4.1.4

Original Text
-------------
   Note that not all link layers use this name, and currently most EAP
   methods do not generate it.  Since the NAS operates in pass-through
   mode, it cannot know the Key-Name before receiving it from the AAA
   server.  As a result, a Key-Name AVP sent in a Diameter-EAP-Request
   MUST NOT contain any data.  A home Diameter server receiving a
   Diameter-EAP-Request with a Key-Name AVP with non-empty data MUST
   silently discard the AVP.  

Corrected Text
--------------
   Note that not all link layers use this name, and currently most EAP
   methods do not generate it.  Since the NAS operates in pass-through
   mode, it cannot know the name of the key before receiving it from the
AAA
   server.  As a result, an EAP-Key-Name AVP sent in a
Diameter-EAP-Request
   MUST NOT contain any data.  A home Diameter server receiving a
   Diameter-EAP-Request containing an EAP-Key-Name AVP with non-empty
data MUST
   silently ignore the AVP.  

Notes
-----
In the original text, the first occurrence of the string "Key-Name"
apparently is meant to refer to the actual name of the key, rather than
an AVP identifier, while the next two occurrences are obviously typos,
since no Key-Name AVP is defined in the document.  Also, the term
"silently discard" is typically used in reference to messages; with
reference to a single AVP, "silently ignore" seems more appropriate.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use
"Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a
decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the
status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC4072 (draft-ietf-aaa-eap-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Diameter Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)
Application
Publication Date    : August 2005
Author(s)           : P. Eronen, Ed., T. Hiller, G. Zorn
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Authentication, Authorization and Accounting
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG