Re: [Dime] Regarding 'P' bit setting in Diameter Header

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Thu, 02 August 2012 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8D211E80D3 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.151, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_FONT_SIZE_LARGE=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_PAIN=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tFqssFj2jRA4 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com (mail-qa0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A3721F85DD for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qadz3 with SMTP id z3so3543736qad.10 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=f/XJKPH2oDvH3cTEdSSYyOrh0ij/Ljx44d/wSGjDVX0=; b=aZY2ZQskY0uT+rTfO6B9/RIKPzm0oOwLZGmq+ld3mlQu1YMl14Kiu/oxkaRhUwdKAx vGuxo9XaWJPvJbv7eCqSzfL+pFCsXwdcoRay4rQEFg9blx3gt9xgVQTFtXFVbIK2DLRS azBTw8xPh2BeKOyb8/pKfYN7S1OSld/HNqIgvDWd3Ij0WKatqZfZYijxD8o8h7nHFr5x GTT9fIaJU9y6GTYp7s7hlDn47Rt76tkqUOCsL4vBj3SgRf1Fx7/h6r81bG0+y6V6nZMo WgJiTYIacyr/8Oen0Z+0+9dA5CT4DaZe3tWdgpkJOrAfuxTklqiUlCFQ9HilTZ4t4Fl+ a0XQ==
Received: by 10.60.13.201 with SMTP id j9mr38346244oec.51.1343929506566; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.195] (216-19-185-109.dyn.novuscom.net. [216.19.185.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7sm5069958oec.2.2012.08.02.10.45.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
To: dime@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <044FE89B8513A3408E08F57DCD25EB1737B397E796@ESESSCMS0357.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <044FE89B8513A3408E08F57DCD25EB1737B397E796@ESESSCMS0357.eemea.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-fUNBjhf+ItMYib2H9p4S"
Organization: Network Zen
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:45:03 -0700
Message-ID: <1343929503.17758.16.camel@gwz-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14)
Subject: Re: [Dime] Regarding 'P' bit setting in Diameter Header
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:45:09 -0000

On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 09:08 +0200, Arud Selvan Sundaramurthy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I  have a doubt in diameter proxy behaviour when routing  a request.
> 
>  
> 
> When diameter proxy receives a request with ‘P’ bit **NOT SET ** in
> header   , and having valid routing entry to route the request to next
> hop, will it route the request to next hop by setting the ‘P’ bit or
> will it reply will “DIAMETER_UNABLE_TO_DELIVER” as the ‘P’ bit is not
> set.  Will the proxy is allowed to modify the header in this case?


No; the value of the 'P' bit is part of the command definition and isn't
modifiable at run time.


> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> As per bis draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-34.txt in section 6.1.9 , it
> states
> 
> “Relay and proxy agents are not required to perform full inspection of
>    incoming messages.  At a minimum, validation of the message header
>    and relevant routing AVPs has to be done when relaying messages.”.
> 
> Does the “minimum header validation” includes checking the ‘P’ in
> header by Proxy agent also?


It actually says "At a minimum," which means 'At the very least'.


> Kindly provide your suggestion on this.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Arud selvan.S.
> 
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime