[Dime] [Errata Rejected] RFC6733 (6833)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 02 October 2023 13:55 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA5CC15108F; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 06:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.468
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wzVhBFAyeveQ; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 06:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5298FC151075; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 06:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 3002EE7292; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 06:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
To: Kshitij.dutt@mindtree.com, vf0213@gmail.com, jari.arkko@ericsson.com, john.loughney@nokia.com, glenzorn@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rwilton@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, dime@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20231002135524.3002EE7292@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 06:55:24 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/FGAB_8Eu9IleHtZ7fGTXjNOUh7E>
Subject: [Dime] [Errata Rejected] RFC6733 (6833)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 13:55:28 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC6733, "Diameter Base Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6833 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Kshitij Dutt <Kshitij.dutt@mindtree.com> Date Reported: 2022-02-03 Rejected by: Rob Wilton (IESG) Section: 2.4 Original Text ------------- The following Application Id values are defined: Diameter common message 0 Diameter base accounting 3 Relay 0xffffffff Corrected Text -------------- The following Application Id values are defined: Diameter common message 0 Diameter base accounting 3 Relay 0xffffff Notes ----- I presume relay application ID should be 0xffffff decimal equivalent of which is 16777215. Instead 0xffffffff decimal translates to 4294967295. This is assumption. --VERIFIER NOTES-- The Application-ID field in the Diameter header is 32 bits long, hence the exist Application Id for "Relay" is correct. -------------------------------------- RFC6733 (draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-33) -------------------------------------- Title : Diameter Base Protocol Publication Date : October 2012 Author(s) : V. Fajardo, Ed., J. Arkko, J. Loughney, G. Zorn, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Diameter Maintenance and Extensions Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Dime] [Errata Rejected] RFC6733 (6833) RFC Errata System