IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] Robert Sparks' Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-05: (withDISCUSS)

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Wed, 30 November 2011 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004F721F8B70 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:05:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.279
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.279 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.320, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bZ6eMv2aUVpq for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:05:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF0921F8B6D for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:05:43 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArMAAPZS1k7GmAcF/2dsb2JhbABEmnCQIoEFgXIBAQEBAwEBAQ8eCjQLDAQCAQgNBAQBAQEKBgwLAQYBJh8JCAEBBBMIARmHbZxPm1GKPWMEmjqMLg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,597,1315195200"; d="scan'208";a="317190985"
Received: from unknown (HELO co300216-co-erhwest.avaya.com) ([198.152.7.5]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2011 11:05:43 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.12]) by co300216-co-erhwest-out.avaya.com with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2011 11:03:43 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:05:41 +0100
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0405AD5C28@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <6B4A8E55-416C-49C8-BD40-3186BBC20E73@g11.org.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Dime] Robert Sparks' Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-05: (withDISCUSS)
Thread-Index: AcyveY3I/djhqvTqRSKRWfuUZX+QuQAACt+A
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0405AD5C19@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <6B4A8E55-416C-49C8-BD40-3186BBC20E73@g11.org.uk>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk>
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Robert Sparks' Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-05: (withDISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:05:45 -0000

Hi Ken,

There may be other reviews and comments until the telechat tomorrow.
However, I suggest to respond to each of them separately. 

Regards,

Dan




> -----Original Message-----
> From: ken carlberg [mailto:carlberg@g11.org.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 6:03 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: dime@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Dime] Robert Sparks' Discuss on
draft-ietf-dime-priority-
> avps-05: (withDISCUSS)
> 
> Dan,
> 
> are we awaiting any further reviews, or does Robert's DISCUSS
culminate
> the reviews/comments from the IESG.
> 
> -ken
> 
> 
> On Nov 30, 2011, at 10:54 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> 
> > Document editors and shepherd,
> >
> > Please address the issues raised by Robert Sparks in his DISCUSS.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: iesg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:iesg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Robert Sparks
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 5:45 PM
> > To: The IESG
> > Cc: dime-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-dime-priority-
> avps@tools.ietf.org
> > Subject: Robert Sparks' Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-05:
> (withDISCUSS)
> >
> > Robert Sparks has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-05: Discuss
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> > Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-
> criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > DISCUSS:
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> >
> > The first paragraph of the Security Considerations section is
> unclear. It appears to instruct elements (not clear which elements) to
> ignore integrity protected values. Does it mean integrity protected
> values that fail integrity check? It indicates that protocol specific
> error messages should be sent when these values are ignored - which
> protocol(s)?  Is the paragraph trying to say something more than
"local
> policy can override the policy requested by protocol messages"?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DiME mailing list
> > DiME@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email