IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] Issue#32 status

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Fri, 28 February 2014 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054101A086E for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:30:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MBjXwn5OkK-C for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:30:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x233.google.com (mail-lb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B091A0862 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:30:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id p9so2511880lbv.24 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:30:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=xTEcn43emxT4OAprzdxZmFCXUwiyWbV7jB7uaEm1VJE=; b=POZZB+KYpOmZzkEU+i6/eRD7G0/kg5w7pMxLAamxubh64ltx0JatDiR1nNfwIvQ0i2 GdN2R982kybhFXQP7Gk52UrfEbjCJ5+sktB6FrJmHae6xupLsBy1xtRG3xLyCkJBM8GU p8F1DiGcOfE/OT8bFk+RYyFLEP4z2v2SOWyaEflYJYprSW/xgJDUEHL2OMikO4/iCuoX E3S5PyEHAWvyFtGFfm5oX0i32JYuapD6kkfB9c3mbiWczNuuy+7X/mBE9C4nMnTbjV5u YMS0oUh7u/KJr7Dz5yU6upfaTUNNdi+HslMUmdUPxcJIablyGV6I0MtS9NgTJWrQXMwb iciQ==
X-Received: by 10.112.63.193 with SMTP id i1mr2170587lbs.54.1393601427399; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:30:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [188.117.15.108] ([188.117.15.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q8sm4342162lbr.3.2014.02.28.07.30.24 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:30:25 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B3D63@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 17:30:23 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <30695D73-312B-498D-A855-B1FA5A0FF27D@gmail.com>
References: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D9000668151B3D63@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net>
To: "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/LYq6H60qwar1mAF6xx5ZeNOdXMU
Cc: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Issue#32 status
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 15:30:34 -0000

Going back in history..

On Feb 19, 2014, at 5:33 PM, "Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)" <ulrich.wiehe@nsn.com> wrote:

> #32: Sequence-Number Time-Stamp values within OC-OLR
>  
> I understand that we agreed the following principles:
>  
> Sequence-Number is of type Time, however the value need not correspond to the point in time of generation.
>  
> When generated, a new sequence number must be  greater than any sequence number previously generated by the same node (including over a reboot of that node)
>  
> When received, a sequence number is used to detect outdates/replays/freshness.
>  
> Sequence numbers of expired OLRs MUST NOT be remembered by reacting nodes.
>  
>  
> I did not understand the requirement for globally uniqueness as introduced by Jouni.
> Can Jouni please explain.

Originated from here:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/current/msg06600.html

So requiring global uniqueness is not desired anymore? 

- Jouni



>  
> Ulrich
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email