Re: [Dime] [dime] #41: Need better overview
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 10 February 2014 16:39 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC2E1A0885 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:39:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2wx1KSq8Xg77 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:39:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061941A06F2 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:39:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.29] (cpe-173-172-146-58.tx.res.rr.com [173.172.146.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s1AGd5U3088892 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:39:07 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <52F90040.6020909@usdonovans.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:39:05 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A4B0E015-E697-4AAF-B2D1-37A2065AC112@nostrum.com>
References: <057.4fed1570cbb27d114428d8cc6fe5dcd2@trac.tools.ietf.org> <8933_1391878974_52F6633D_8933_14099_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E49395B@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <52F90040.6020909@usdonovans.com>
To: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 173.172.146.58 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>, "draft-docdt-dime-ovli@tools.ietf.org" <draft-docdt-dime-ovli@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] [dime] #41: Need better overview
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:39:13 -0000
I can volunteer for that, with the caveat that it probably won't happen before the IETF89 draft deadline. On Feb 10, 2014, at 10:37 AM, Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com> wrote: > I think the way to handle this issue in the issue tracker is to assign it to one of the authors and that author would then be responsible for generating overview text. > > Steve > > On 2/8/14 11:02 AM, lionel.morand@orange.com wrote: >> Hi Ben, >> >> Any proposal? >> >> Regards, >> >> Lionel >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : DiME [ >> mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org >> ] De la part de dime issue tracker >> Envoyé : vendredi 7 février 2014 21:55 >> À : >> draft-docdt-dime-ovli@tools.ietf.org; ben@nostrum.com >> >> Cc : >> dime@ietf.org >> >> Objet : [Dime] [dime] #41: Need better overview >> >> #41: Need better overview >> >> The overview is short on explanation. We need a high level, non-normative >> "how it works" description of the mechanism, including roles, >> responsibilities, associations, and information flows. This doesn't need >> too much detail (e.g. message and AVP definitions belong elsewhere.) >> >> Some of the information in the endpoint architecture section would be >> better off here. >> >> >
- [Dime] [dime] #41: Need better overview dime issue tracker
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #41: Need better overview lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #41: Need better overview Steve Donovan
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #41: Need better overview Ben Campbell
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #41: Need better overview lionel.morand
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #41 (draft-docdt-dime-ovli): Ne… dime issue tracker
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #41 (draft-docdt-dime-ovli): Ne… TROTTIN, JEAN-JACQUES (JEAN-JACQUES)
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #41 (draft-docdt-dime-ovli): Ne… Wiehe, Ulrich (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #41 (draft-docdt-dime-ovli): Ne… Shishufeng (Susan)
- Re: [Dime] [dime] #41 (draft-ietf-dime-ovli): Nee… dime issue tracker