[Dime] WG Action: Conclusion of Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (dime)

IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Thu, 14 March 2024 04:02 UTC

Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dime@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E06C1519B6; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: dime@ietf.org, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, lionel.morand@huawei.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.8.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: iesg@ietf.org
Message-ID: <171038896854.19170.3861106679509759511@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:02:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dime/NVR9J9QTct1DPn54Oza7Z4Eh8C0>
Subject: [Dime] WG Action: Conclusion of Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (dime)
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 04:02:48 -0000

The Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (dime) WG in the Operations and 
Management Area has concluded. The IESG contact persons are Warren 
Kumari and Robert Wilton.

The mailing list will remain open.

--

Hi DIME WG,

As will come as no surprise, I am closing the DIME WG.
This is in an effort to transition my work to Mahesh in as clean a
state as possible.

Given, various emails that I have seen, and errata raised, I’m aware
that folks are implementing and using Diameter. It is always nice to
see when the IETF standards are adopted by industry.

I would like to thank everyone involved in this work, from the chairs
to the regular participants, with the WG producing 31 RFCs over the
time that it has been chartered.

The mailing list will remain open to allow for future discussion,
resolution of errata, etc.

Small maintenance work for the Diameter protocol can be taken to the
OPSAWG WG, but larger work items would need the WG to be rechartered
again to scope and facilitate the new work.

Thanks again for your efforts.
Rob