Re: [Dime] Peter Saint-Andre's Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-29: (withDISCUSS and COMMENT)

On Mar 9, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Glen Zorn wrote:

> On 3/8/2012 10:48 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 3/8/12 8:27 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>>> Peter,
>>> 
>>> The text in recently submitted -30 Section 5.2 (
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-30#section-5.2) should
>>> also address your DISCUSS.
>> 
>> Thanks for the pointer to a specific section.
>> 
>> That change does address my primary concern, which was:
>> 
>>   RFC 3588 used DNS SRV Proto values of 'tcp' and 'sctp' for the SRV
>>   Service of 'diameter'. 3588bis seems to add two more Proto values:
>>   'tls' and 'dtls'.  However, RFC 6335, which defines updated rules
>>   for the ports and services registry, allows only TCP, UDP, SCTP,
>>   and DCCP as transport protocols.
>> 
>> My secondary concern was this:
>> 
>>   Furthermore, this specification does not register the 'diameter'
>>   SRV Service value in accordance with RFC 6335. Because these values
>>   were not defined or registered by draft-ietf-dime-extended-naptr, I
>>   think they need to be defined here.
>> 
>> Please see Section 8.1 of RFC 6335 for the registration procedure:
>> 
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6335#section-8.1
>> 
>> I think you can add this quite easily in a revised I-D before the
>> deadline on Monday, or your AD can add an RFC Editor note.
> 
> OK, what to do about the port number, etc.?  Jouni, since you
> volunteered that we would do this, how about writing the section?

That's ok.

- Jouni

> 
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Peter
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime