[Dime] Before moving the Design guidelines document to IESG

<lionel.morand@orange.com> Fri, 26 April 2013 16:52 UTC

Return-Path: <lionel.morand@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A672321F9A57 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jC6cKNxtBqql for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E95521F9A4F for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.3]) by omfedm10.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id AE30026451A for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:52:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.186]) by omfedm07.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 9341D4C063 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:52:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::cc7e:e40b:42ef:164e]) by PEXCVZYH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:52:56 +0200
From: lionel.morand@orange.com
To: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Before moving the Design guidelines document to IESG
Thread-Index: Ac5Cnn/heelcI04iSiOak8vRlWj96A==
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:52:55 +0000
Message-ID: <29074_1366995176_517AB0E8_29074_4713_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E1C609D@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.197.38.1]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E1C609DPEXCVZYM13corpora_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2013.4.26.151519
Subject: [Dime] Before moving the Design guidelines document to IESG
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:52:58 -0000

In IETF85, it was agreed to include in the design guidelines document the recommendations for set-up of IPsec transport connections that was removed from RFC6733.
After a final review before submission to IESG, it was raised that only IKEv1 [RFC2409] was considered in this section whereas it was obsoleted by IKEv2 [RFC 4306 and then RFC5996].
However, we are still in a migration phase and IKEv1 is still used.

My proposal would be to update the section 5.11 as follow:
-              recommend IKEv2 for peer authentication
-              keep the existing recommendations for cases where onlyIKEv1 is available

Any comment?

Lionel

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.